Примеры использования The panel finds that the claim на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the claim is not compensable.
However, the consignment by air would likely have arrived before 17 July 1990, and as the claimant provided no specific proof that the loss was a direct result of Iraq's invasion andoccupation of Kuwait, the Panel finds that the claim based on the consignment by air is not compensable.
Moreover, the Panel finds that the claim is unsubstantiated.
For the reasons stated at paragraph above, the Panel finds that the claim for real property is limited to SAR 3,732,502.
The Panel finds that the claim is a duplicate of the Cyprus claim. .
For the reasons stated at paragraph above, the Panel finds that the claim for other tangible property is, in principle, compensable.
The Panel finds that the claim must be adjusted to offset such"risk of overstatement.
For the reasons stated at paragraph above, the Panel finds that the claim for real property damage in Al Samah is, in principle, compensable.
The Panel finds that the claim fails to satisfy such evidentiary requirements.
For the reasons stated at paragraphs and above, the Panel finds that the claim for other tangible property damage in Al Khafji is, in principle, compensable.
The Panel finds that the claim for loss of future profits is speculative and unsupported.
As to the claim described at paragraph,where the claimant attempted to resume the sale of a mould with the Kuwaiti buyer, the Panel finds that the claim is compensable inasmuch as the item was, in fact, rendered obsolete in 1992 as a result of a delay directly caused by the invasion.
The Panel finds that the claim is compensable but an adjustment should be made for insufficient evidence.
For the reasons stated at paragraphs and below, the Panel finds that the claim for medical assistance provided to Iraqi refugees and prisoners of war is not compensable, in principle./.
The Panel finds that the claim for taxes and dues relates to obligations of Iraq that arose prior to 2 May 1990.
With respect to the payment for the amount of USD 165,400, the Panel finds that the claim relates to work that was performed prior to 2 May 1990 and that the amounts due under the letter of credit arrangement were deferred payments.
The Panel finds that the claim for the unpaid invoices relates entirely to work that was performed prior to 2 May 1990.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the claim is not compensable.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the claims of the two port operators do not meet the standards of paragraph 11 of decision 9.
Consequently, the Panel finds that the claim for the special allowances is not compensable.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the claim for KWD 9,450 is compensable in principle.
The Panel finds that the claim for USD 672 in respect of a debt arising prior to 2 May 1990 falls outside of the Commission's jurisdiction.
The Panel finds that the claim is compensable in principle, to the extent that Zhejiang can establish proof of payment.
The Panel finds that the claim amount of US$116,802,613 for the value of the PNs at the time of the claim is correctly stated.
The Panel finds that the claim relates to work that was performed prior to 2 May 1990 and the amounts due under the letter of credit arrangement were deferred payments.
The Panel finds that the claim with respect to“administrative fees” in the amount of USD 1,430(FRF 7,500), is more accurately classified as a claim for claim preparation costs.
The Panel finds that the claim for contract losses, although arising from Iraq's alleged breach of the terms of the loan agreement, is based on the delivery of goods prior to 2 May 1990.
The Panel finds that the claim is compensable subject to there being probative evidence, such as contemporaneous records or witness testimony, as to amounts ordinarily held there by MOJ.
The Panel finds that the claim relates to work that was performed prior to 2 May 1990 and is therefore outside the jurisdiction of the Commission and is not compensable under Security Council resolution 687 1991.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the claim for appreciation of goodwill is unduly speculative and that the claim should be valued on the basis of the original cost of the goodwill.