Примеры использования Their imposition на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Indeed, they reject their imposition and support my country.
Restrictions should be lifted immediately when the grounds for their imposition no longer exist.
Their imposition, or the adding of interest to fines, could not be contrary to the public policy of the Russian Federation.
Thus, while no sanctions can be breached, their imposition does not impair the lawful running of the company.
For that reason it was important to assess properly the conseqences of sanctions before and during their imposition.
One key feature of such sanctions is that their imposition and monitoring requires organized collective action.
The remark was also made that meaningful consultations could hardly be held on the impact of sanctions prior to their imposition.
Emphasis was placed on the need to assess the effects of sanctions before and during their imposition, with the aim of adjusting the sanctions regime.
The proliferation of different codes and their imposition on the same suppliers is part of the problem; it imposes excessive burdens on suppliers and leads them to game the system.
Lawful in terms of the reason for them, so that they are based on a genuine,actual reason that justifies their imposition;
If such sentences are disproportionate to the crimes for which they are imposed, their imposition may involve a violation of article 7 of the Covenant.
Moreover, sanctions should not be imposed, under any pretext, to achieve the political goals of the most powerful countries, which play the leading role in the process of decision-making in the Security Council, and should be lifted as soon as the threat to peace,which accounted for their imposition, has been eliminated.
An assessment of the potential impact of sanctions prior to their imposition as well as an assessment of actually incurred consequences was of paramount importance to all concerned.
We have always believed that sanctions are a blunt instrument andshould be carefully used when their imposition becomes imperative.
On the issue of sanctions, Malaysia in principle opposes their imposition due to their debilitating impact on the general population of a Member State.
In 2011, CAT reiterated that restrictions should be individualized, proportionate, andlifted as soon as the grounds for their imposition no longer existed.
On the issue of sanctions,Malaysia in principle continues to oppose their imposition owing to the debilitating impact of sanctions on the general population.
The feasibility of objective assessments of the short-term and long-term socio-economic andhumanitarian consequences of sanctions before their imposition was questioned.
Accordingly, such measures should be lifted as soon as the emergency which justified their imposition no longer exists or can be managed by less intrusive means under the relevant instrument.
Admittedly, pronouncements of the General Assembly would not be binding, as are the decisions and resolutions of the Security Council, but States would feel strengthened in their resolve to impose sanctions by relying on the rationale andthe legitimacy of General Assembly resolutions justifying their imposition.
During the period under review, the Council took note of decisions by regional organizations concerning their imposition of sanctions, although it fell short of authorizing such actions.
Sanctions should be applied strictly in accordance with international law, especially the Charter, and in order to minimize or avoid adverse impacts they must be clearly defined, targeted and imposed for a specific period, be subject to periodic review andbe lifted as soon as the reasons for their imposition had ceased to exist.
The imposition of such punishments should cease immediately, and all laws anddecrees providing for their imposition, including RCC Decree No. 109 of 1994, should be revoked without delay.
The view was expressed by some delegations that since sanctions causedindiscriminate harm to human life and damage to property, their imposition should be approached with great prudence.
Under the sunset clause, anti-dumping duties will automatically cease effect after five years from their imposition unless the investigating authorities have conducted reviews and determined that termination was likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
They emphasized that sanctions should not be imposed unilaterally, should be limited in duration, should be subject to regular review andshould be removed once the reason for their imposition no longer exists or the objective is achieved.
In addition, there is a need to analyse the present mechanism of sanctions to ensure that their imposition is balanced and well-grounded, in particular taking into account eventual negative consequences for third countries.
It was noted further that sanctions should be clearly defined, targeted, imposed for a specific time frame, subject to periodic review andlifted as soon as the reason for their imposition has ceased to exist or the situation giving rise to their imposition had returned to normalcy.
The continued application by certain countries of extra-territorial measures and legislation and their imposition of unilateral coercive economic measures against certain developing countries, with a view to preventing these countries from exercising their right to determine, with their total free will, their own political, economic and social system.