Примеры использования They should be imposed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
They should be imposed only if absolutely necessary.
Mr. Kanu(Sierra Leone) said that,given the potentially disastrous effect of sanctions, they should be imposed only as a last resort.
In any event, they should be imposed by a judge or under his or her authority;
It was deemed that once the Security Council decided to proceed with sanctions, they should be imposed in accordance with established criteria and a specific time frame.
They should be imposed gradually so that their effects and usefulness could be reviewed.
Their objectives should be clearly defined andbased on tenable legal grounds, and they should be imposed for a specific time frame and lifted when their objectives had been achieved.
They should be imposed for a specific period and lifted as soon as their answers had been achieved.
However, the fact that such boundaries have not been established does not mean that they should be imposed unilaterally in order to prevent the relationship between the two States from deteriorating.
They should be imposed for a specified time frame and be lifted as soon as their objectives were achieved.
They should be imposed for a limited period,be strictly monitored and be subject to regular review.
While sanctions remained an important means of maintaining international peace andsecurity without the use of force, they should be imposed only as a last resort and in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Charter.
They should be imposed for a specific period of time, monitored regularly and lifted as soon as their objective had been achieved.
In voicing their support for the principles contained in section III of the working paper,a number of delegations affirmed the exceptional nature of sanctions and asserted that they should be imposed as a last resort, only after all means of peaceful settlement of disputes had been exhausted.
They should be imposed in accordance with the provisions of the Charter and international law and should be subject to review.
Mr. Medrek(Morocco) said, with regard to assistance to third States affected bythe application of sanctions, that the use of sanctions had increased greatly in recent years despite the fact that they should be imposed only as an exceptional measure once all the other peaceful methods for settling disputes had been exhausted.
They should be imposed for a specified time only, and the justification for imposing them should be defined and subject to periodic review.
Given that the aim of sanctions was above all to modify the behaviourof a State and that they invariably affected third States, they should be imposed only as a last resort, when all the methods enshrined in the Charter had been exhausted, and in strict conformity with the Charter.
Lastly, they should be imposed only in situations that threatened international peace and security, such situations being evaluated on the basis of confirmed and authenticated information.
Mr. Boon Pracong(Thailand) said that mandatory sanctions,which had a firm basis in the Charter of the United Nations, were a useful mechanism for preserving international peace and security, although to the extent possible they should be imposed with due care to avoid negative material and financial consequences for third States.
They should be imposed only in order to achieve specific, agreed objectives; and clear and precise conditions should be laid down regarding the steps which the target State should take in order for them to be lifted.
In order to avoid sanctions from being counterproductive and having negative consequences, not only on the targeted States but also on third States,some delegations pointed out that they should be imposed only after all means of peaceful settlement of disputes under the provisions of the Charter have been exhausted.
They should be imposed only in accordance with Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations and after all peaceful means of dispute settlement had been exhausted, and a study of their short- and long-term effects should be undertaken.
Some proposals also suggested that a mechanism should be agreed upon to govern the imposition of sanctions, that they should be imposed only after all peaceful settlement efforts had been exhausted, and that they should only be decreed by the Security Council under Chapter VII of the Charter for a determined duration stipulated in the resolution itself.
They should be imposed with the greatest prudence, after all peaceful means of settling disputes had been exhausted, in order to avoid their having effects that were contrary to the objectives pursued or harmful consequences for either the target State or third States.
Their objectives should be clearly defined and they should be lifted as soon as those objectives had been achieved; they should be imposed for a specific period of time; the conditions for their lifting must be clearly defined and reviewed periodically; and attempts to impose or extend them for reasons other than the specified objectives should be rejected.
While supporting the use of fair sanctions, imposed appropriately and for the minimum period of time possible by the United Nations in its task of guaranteeing international peace, we feel that the decision to impose sanctions, especially those which will ultimately affect the whole population of a given country,must be justified and that they should be imposed only as a last resort.
However, they should be imposed by the Security Council in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations and international law, and should only be considered after all means of peaceful settlement of disputes had been exhausted.
The Ugandan delegation agreed that sanctions were an instrument for the maintenance of peace and security and conflict prevention; it believed,however, that they should be imposed only as a last resort, bearing in mind their impact on innocent civilians and third States and the fact that, in most cases, sanctions hurt civilians more than the Governments they were designed to target.
The limitations must be"provided by law", they should be imposed for one of the purposes set out in subparagraphs(a) and(b) of the article, and they must be justified as being"necessary" for one of those purposes.