Примеры использования Threat or use of nuclear на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In the advisory opinion on the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, the Court observed that.
They must work to adopt an international instrument prohibiting the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
Cuba believes that the threat or use of nuclear weapons is illegal under all circumstances and at all times.
However, the International Court did do so in its advisory opinion on the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.
To postpone giving a legal opinion on the threat or use of nuclear weapons until an actual case occurs is like substituting medicine with an autopsy.
Люди также переводят
It should examine ways andmeans to reassure all non-nuclear-weapon States against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
The Court proceeded to determine whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons is inherently incompatible with international humanitarian lawor the law of neutrality.
For without such ironclad guarantees,the non-nuclear-weapon States will remain subject to the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
The threat or use of nuclear weapons would be contrary to the rules of international law applicable to armed conflict, and in particular the principles and the rules of humanitarian law;
The International Court of Justice could find no circumstance in which the threat or use of nuclear weapons would conform to such law.
The guarantee against the threat or use of nuclear weapons can be a potent confidence-building measure, both as an interim step and as an incentive for the attainment of total nuclear disarmament, which is our ultimate goal.
Malaysia is encouraged by the recent International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
Until then, the non-nuclear-weapon States will continue to be vulnerable to the threat or use of nuclear weapons, except for those covered by the umbrella of nuclear alliances.
Kuwait endorses the adoption of effective international measures to provide non-nuclear States with guarantees against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
In the case concerning the Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons, the Court had noted that the international community was profoundly divided on the matter but it had stressed the applicability of the principles and rules of humanitarian law to a situation involving the possible use of nuclear weapons.
States such as mine that have made an unambiguous non-proliferation commitment have the right to assurances against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
The text of the draft resolution this year refers specifically to the opinion of the International Court of Justice that the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict- that is, the principles and provisions of humanitarian law.
Recognizing the need for a multilaterally negotiated andlegally binding instrument to assure non-nuclear-weapon States against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
While we welcome this ruling,we do not agree with another assertion of the Court within the Opinion that the threat or use of nuclear weapons could be legal in the extreme circumstance of self-defence.
Since 1978, the General Assembly has asked the Conference on Disarmament to negotiate a legally binding international agreement to assure the non-nuclear-weapon States against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
In spite of our unflinching commitment tothe provisions of the NPT and repeated calls over the years to be assured, through a legally binding international instrument, against the threat or use of nuclear weapons by our powerful partners, their response has not been at all reassuring.
We believe that efforts in the field of nuclear disarmament should be directed towards a convention prohibiting the production, testing, deployment, stockpiling,transfer, threat or use of nuclear weapons.
Non-nuclear-weapon States are especially at risk andare largely unable to protect themselves against the threat or use of nuclear weapons by nuclear-weapon States.
Importance of the recent decision by the Conference on Disarmament to establish an Ad Hoc Committee to consider effective international arrangements to assure non-nuclear-weapon States against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
Decides, pursuant to Article 96(1) of the Charter,to request the International Court of Justice to urgently render its advisory opinion on the following question,'Is the threat or use of nuclear weapons in any circumstance permitted under international law?
We believe that there is a need to revitalize efforts to establish legallybinding international instruments so as to provide the non-nuclear-weapon States parties to the Treaty with safeguards against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.
The sponsors are satisfied that none of the nuclear-weapon States has ruled out the option of concluding a binding international instrument against the threat or use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
Fourthly, there is also a need for an unconditional international instrument to provide security guarantees to non-nuclear-weapon States in order to safeguard them from any threat or use of nuclear weapons.
Cuba stresses the urgent need to commence multilateral negotiations leading to an early conclusion of a convention prohibiting the development, production, deployment, stockpiling,transfer, threat or use of nuclear weapons and providing for their elimination.
The Model Nuclear Weapons Confention however,does not address the security issues that gave rise to nuclear deterrence policies other than those relating to deterrence against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.