Примеры использования To be bound by protocol на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
States had notified the Depositary of their consent to be bound by Protocol I.
Accession(with consent to be bound by Protocols I and III): Gabon(1 October 2007)1.
Only nine Respondent States have given their consent to be bound by Protocol V to the CCW.
The following 9 States had consented to be bound by Protocol IV, 2 adopted by the Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on 13 October 1995 at Geneva: Cambodia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Japan, Panama, Philippines and Sweden.
IX. List of States which have notified the Depositary of their consent to be bound by Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War.
As of 4 November 1997, 71 States were parties to the Convention and its original three Protocols; 10 States had consented to be bound by the revised Protocol II; and 14 States had consented to be bound by Protocol IV.
Since the Fourth Review Conference,Burundi acceded to the CCW and consented to be bound by Protocol II and Protocol V. This took place on 13 July 2012.
Ii Of the[100] States Parties to the CCW only[Morocco and Senegal]have not deemed it possible so far to express consent to be bound by Protocol I;
He commended the 69 countries that had notified their consent to be bound by Protocol V and called on those States that had not yet done so to consider such action as soon as possible.
Ii Of the 100 States Parties to the Convention only two States Parties have not deemed it possible so far to express consent to be bound by Protocol I;
The following State Party to the Convention,which has notified its consent to be bound by Protocol V, but for which it is not yet in force, participated in the work of the Conference: China.
France, which was a party to the Convention and all the Protocols annexed thereto,had recently declared its consent to be bound by Protocol V, from 30 April 2007.
The following High Contracting Parties to the Convention,which has notified its consent to be bound by Protocol V, but for which it is not yet in force, participated in the work of the Conference: Argentina, Burundi and Poland.
Welcome the entry into force of Protocol V on 12 November 2006 andthe fact that 26 States have notified the Depositary of their consent to be bound by Protocol V by that date.
Any State that expresses its consent to be bound by Protocol II after the amended Protocol II entered into force on 3 December 1998 is considered to have consented to be bound by Protocol II, as amended, unless it expresses a contrary intention.
The Group welcomed the States Parties which had notified the United Nations Secretary-General of their consent to be bound by Protocol V on ERW: Sweden, Lithuania and Sierra Leone.
The following States Parties to the Convention,which have notified their consent to be bound by Protocol V, but for which it is not yet in force, participated in the work of the Preparatory Committee: Australia, Slovenia, Spain, and The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Australia urged all Parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons andother States that had not yet done so to consent to be bound by Protocol V as soon as possible.
On 1 November 1998 Poland started to be bound by Protocol 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, concerning the transformation of the inspection mechanism established by the Convention, drawn up in Strasbourg on 11 May 1994 Dz.U. of 1998, No. 147, item 962.
On 12 May 2006- the date by which 20 States Parties to the CCW notified their consent to be bound by Protocol V, the conditions for the entry into force of the Protocol were met.
Austria had ratified the Convention on certain Conventional Weapons and Protocols, I, II, III and IV annexed thereto. Furthermore,on 1 October 2007, it had notified the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the depositary of the Convention, of its consent to be bound by Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War.
Having congratulated the 48 countries that had, to date,officially expressed their consent to be bound by Protocol V, which had been adopted in November 2003, he recalled the important decisions taken at the First Conference and the flexible framework for international cooperation and assistance it had established, from which all would benefit.
Mr. Thammavongsa(Lao People's Democratic Republic) said that the Lao People's Democratic Republic had in 2012 submitted the instrument of consent to be bound by Protocol V and had already submitted its first national report.
Pursuant to Article 10(1) of the Protocol and the established practice,twentytwo States which have notified their consent to be bound by Protocol V co-signed a letter, dated 18 November 2006, addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, inviting him to convene at Geneva a Conference of the High Contracting Parties to the Protocol in 2007, in conjunction with other CCW meetings, with a Preparatory meeting to be held in the spring of 2007.
Mr. Pelaez(Observer for Argentina) said that on 7 October 2010, Argentina had notified the Secretary-General of the United Nations of its consent to be bound by Protocol V, which would enter into force for it on 7 April 2012.
At the same meeting,the Group welcomed the States Parties which had notified the Secretary-General of the United Nations of their consent to be bound by Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War Protocol: Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, India, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Norway, Sierra Leone, Sweden and Ukraine.
Djibouti had provided ample proof on the international stage of its willingness to combat the use of weapons that were excessively injurious or struck indiscriminately and to curb their damaging effects. It had signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions on 30 July 2010 and had been one of the first States parties to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention. It had ratified the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons in 1996 anddeclared its consent to be bound by Protocols I, II and III annexed thereto.
At the meeting the Group welcomed the 16 States Parties which had notified the Secretary-General of the United Nations of their consent to be bound by Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War: Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Holy See, India, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Norway, Sierra Leone, Sweden and Ukraine.
More recently, in early 2010,several European States objected to the reservation formulated by the United States of America when expressing its consent to be bound by Protocol III to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects.
Arrangements for ratification of amended article 1 of the Convention were progressing, while the Government had taken steps in order to be able to notify its consent to be bound by Protocol V. Through those measures, Poland had reaffirmed its support for humanitarian law and the protection of civilians from certain conventional weapons which had indiscriminate effects.