Примеры использования To this draft article на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
One point remains unclear in relation to this draft article.
The commentary to this draft article states two questions on which the Working Group has invited comments.
In this regard, the Commission noted, in the commentary to this draft article.
It was also noted that the key to this draft article was the right of every person with disabilities to live in the community.
The foregoing comments indicate that Governments have entered many reservations to this draft article.
The United Kingdom reiterates the same concerns with regard to this draft article as are set out above in its comments on draft article 2.
Given that draft article 9 addresses this concern only very implicitly and in a somewhat imperfect manner,the Special Rapporteur wonders whether the principle of prohibition of expulsion by a State of its own nationals could not be recalled in the commentary to this draft article.
Draft article 3 leaves unclear whether derogation is permitted, since according to this draft article both sets of rules are applicable.
Paragraph(2) of the commentary to this draft article provides that the obligation to reduce and control pollution reflects the current practice of States.
Although we had previously commentedon draft article 2, we wish to highlight a factual error in the earlier commentaries to this draft article and seek clarifications with regard to a related proposition.
But as the content of the commentary to this draft article shows, this"right of return" is circumscribed by a plethora of conditions and strict limitations.
With the addition of a requirement in draft article 50, subparagraph 2(b), along the lines of that of draft article 52, subparagraph 2(c), that the destruction of the goods by the carrier be carried out in accordance with the law or regulations of the place where the goods were located at the time, the Commission approved the substance of draft article 50 and referred it to the drafting group.For consequential changes to this draft article, see also paras. 166-168 above.
The European Commission notes that the commentaries to this draft article are largely devoted to United Nations practice and to a discussion of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
Paragraph(2) of the commentary to this draft article describes the principle set out in the draft article as"trite", which has led one Member State to respond that, on the contrary, it is an important principle.
The last issue to be considered in relation to this draft article is whether the Commission should also consider cases in which two States parties to a treaty are on the same side in an armed conflict?
In giving a negative formulation to this draft article, the Commission had wanted to stress that the State of nationality of the shareholders could exercise diplomatic protection only under exceptional circumstances in two situations which, according to the commentary, were"accepted" by the International Court of Justice in 1970 see commentary on draft article 11, para. 3.
As the Commission indicated in its commentary to this draft article, it did not go as far as some States would have liked, or as far as the practice of some States could have suggested."It confined itself to what appeared to be reasonable as an exercise in the progressive development of international law, having regard to current trends in international law and to some national laws.
It was proposed to insert in this draft article a reference to the limitations arising from the protection of human rights.
There was general agreement to the importance of this draft article.
Without further clarification on this point Australia is not in a position to form a view as to whether this draft article is consistent with existing international law.
In paragraph(4) of the commentary to draft article 9, the Commission notes that the obligation of States enshrined in this draft article is limited to the protection of"relevant ecosystems.
There was a suggestion to broaden the scope of this draft article from aquifer States to all States.
This draft article is intended to facilitate this process.
According to ILO, this draft article and the two following ones"seem to deny a distinct legal personality of international organizations" A/CN.4/637, sect. II.B.23, para. 2.
The indicia referred to in draft article 4 are also relevant to the application of this draft article.
It might be more accurate to refer throughout this draft article to"members" in general rather than to"member States or international organizations", because of the possibility that an international organization avails itself of the conduct of a member which is not a State or an international organization.
We believe that the nature and contours of"disguised expulsion" have not been sufficiently addressed and defined through existing State practice orjurisprudence for this issue to be codified as in this draft article.
Although some members felt that it was not necessary to establish a full consistency between the two sets of draft articles, it was considered desirable to bring this draft article into line with the draft on State responsibility.