Примеры использования Two notions на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The two notions are not synonymous.
It was almost a century before the two notions were put togeth.
The two notions needed to be addressed separately.
Most delegations, however, were in favour of maintaining the distinction between the two notions.
Here again, tThese two notions seem to be used synonymously.
In their fight against terrorism and in order torespect the freedom of expression, States should be careful to differentiate the two notions.
Here, asinany metropolis, two notions collide- history and the modernage.
Even as we speak of knowledge, we should first of all distin-guishknowledge from information and understand the huge differ-ence between those two notions.
These two notions are defined, in particular, in articles 10 and 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The Court of Cassation also defined these two notions, as well as the notion of"publicity" of statement of fact.
These two notions are closely related with each other, and UI is commonly a part of UX where UX stands for user experience and UI for user interface.
From September, 30 some norms of the Law on NPS go into effect,which separate two notions: reception of payments and money transfers.
We affirm that those two notions are not and should not be linked to existing international human rights instruments.
Lastly, the issue of the inviolability of State officials should be included in the study of immunity, given the close links between the two notions.
Obviously, the two notions are mathematical objects of a different nature, although there are some links between the two from an intuitive perspective.
The examination of international treaties, internal legislation andjudicial practice must therefore take into account that difference between the two notions.
Two notions help to pinpoint the issues associated with the involvement of civil society in local governance:"inclusiveness" and"empowerment of civil society.
It was further suggested that the issue of the inviolability of State officials be included in the study of the topic,given the close links between the two notions.
A concern was expressed that the reference in the same paragraph to the two notions of effectiveness and irrevocability might give rise to difficulties in the interpretation of the draft Convention.
One delegation pointed out that theprovisions of article 13, once more demonstrated that there was a need to maintain the distinction between the two notions:"mission" and"visit.
These two notions not only form the backbone of this Convention, but should also form the cornerstone of sound international relations, especially in the field of disarmament and arms control.
For his part, he felt that although in many cases the regime of conditional interpretative declarations could be brought into line with that of reservations,it did not seem possible to completely assimilate the two notions.
It was suggested that, should the two notions belong to the same legal category, the distinction between them might be regarded as artificial and might lead to difficulties in implementation and practice.
A further concern was that the reference to both good faith andthe absence of knowledge that the transfer was in violation of an existing security right was superfluous, as those two notions had the same meaning.
The difference between the two notions is that a natural transformation is a particular collection of morphisms of type of the form S( A)→ T( A){\displaystyle S(A)\to T(A)}, while objects of the comma category contains all morphisms of type of such form.
Indeed, at the time the report was written, torture was included in the portion of the criminal code devoted to crimes against humanity, butthere was in fact no link between these two notions, or to crimes committed against civilian populations.
It was also argued that the International Law Commission should clearly distinguish the two notions and that universal jurisdiction should be dealt with in the future draft articles only to the extent necessary for the study of the obligation to extradite or prosecute.
It had been suggested that the Commission should deal with universal jurisdiction only in so far as it related directly to the topic, andit had been proposed that the relationship between the two notions should be addressed in a specific provision of the future draft articles.
It was also argued that the Commission should clearly distinguish the two notions and that universal jurisdiction should be dealt with in the future draft articles only to the extent necessary for the study of the obligation to extradite or prosecute.
Other delegations doubted that the Commission should study universal jurisdiction in this context, either because they considered that universal jurisdiction was not a precondition for the existence of the obligation orbecause they saw no direct relationship between the two notions.