Примеры использования Types of asset на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Exceptions for certain types of asset.
For these types of asset, the laws of many States provide that priority of a security right may be established either by possession or registration.
Exceptions for certain types of asset.
In the case of certain types of asset, such as the proceeds under an independent undertaking, control may be the exclusive method for achieving effectiveness against third parties.
Proceeds of excluded types of asset.
It was stated that one approach was to abolish all existing security rights andto introduce a new one that could be created in all types of asset.
Second is the question of whether certain types of asset should not be susceptible of encumbrance by a security right.
Different third-party effectiveness methods for different types of asset.
However, even in such States, the distinctions between different types of asset remain where acquisition security rights are an issue.
This section deals with priority issues relating to such types of asset.
Borrowers that are able to offer as collateral particular types of asset, such as household goods, can be included in the financial system and obtain access to affordable credit.
Different third-party effectiveness methods for different types of asset.
In States that permit the creation of non-possessory security rights only in certain types of asset, but not in inventory, retention of title is used for inventory financing.
Enacting States will need to enact special priority rules in relation to those types of asset.
The Fund's policy of broad diversification of its investments by currency, types of asset classes and geographical areas continued to be the most reliable method of reducing risk and improving returns over long periods of time.
That mirrored the approach taken by the Commission to laws applicable to all other types of asset, such as intangible assets. .
Given the important differences in legal regimes between intellectual property and other types of asset, if such an approach were adopted, the principles of the Guide on acquisition financing with respect to tangible assets could not simply be transposed to the intellectual property context.
Part B is devoted to a discussion of particular methods for achieving third-party effectiveness that apply to specific types of asset.
The Working Group considered the question whether conflict of laws rules should be prepared with respect to security rights in other types of asset, such as bank deposits, letters of credit, securities and intellectual property rights.
It was widely felt that the draft Guide should discuss both approaches taken in legal systems towards a uniform security right in all types of asset.
It was further agreed that the study coulddiscuss the advantages and disadvantages of the various solutions i.e. a uniform law on all types of asset as opposed to a set of principles with a guide or a uniform law on specific types of asset.
This issue has been discussed at two meetings of Canberra II, and concerns the treatment of contracts, leases andlicences relating to different types of asset.
In some legal systems,special laws for specific types of non-possessory security right introduce limitations as to the types of asset that may serve as security or as to the part of the value of assets that may be encumbered.
Section B of this chapter considers various mandatory and non-mandatory rules to dealwith pre-default rights and obligations in relation to particular types of asset and transaction.
The general question that the Commission may wish to address is whether priority issues relating to certain types of asset, the assignment of which has been excluded from the draft Convention, should be addressed if those types of asset are proceeds derived from receivables.
Section B of this chapter considers the various mandatory and non-mandatory rules that might be contemplated to dealwith pre-default rights and obligations in relation to particular types of asset and transaction.
Such an approach could be taken in legal systems that allowed security to be taken in all types of asset, including future and after-acquired assets. .
Mr. Dubovec(National Law Center for Inter-American Trade),referring to the phrase in paragraph 12 which stated that coordination among registries would only be required if the secured transactions law"excluded" some types of asset.
Even in States thathave adopted registration systems, third-party effectiveness of rights in certain types of asset, such as consumer goods, is sometimes automatic.
Once agreement had been reached with respect to the rules applicable to those assets, the Working Group could consider whether conflict rules with respect to security rights in other types of asset might be necessary.