Примеры использования Use of npos на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
CCAQ also noted that the use of NPOs was becoming more widespread.
Twelve organizations of the United Nations common system confirmed the use of NPOs.
Some noted that the upsurge in the use of NPOs was proof of the validity of the category.
WHO officials argued that cost-efficiency was only part of the rationale behind the use of NPOs.
In 1981, the Commission had examined a report by CCAQ on the use of NPOs and had expanded the reporting requirements.
The Commission recognized that the central issue before it was the proposed revised criteria for the use of NPOs.
For the most part, managers were candid in acknowledging that the use of NPOs in the offshore service centres was not in line with ICSC criteria.
To what extent are all four of the following elements being used to identify, prevent and combat terrorist financing abuse of NPOs.
Furthermore, the widespread use of NPOs was prejudicial to the recruitment and career development of young international Professional staff.
To reaffirm the criteria of 2006 governing the use of NPOs and, in particular.
In approving the use of NPOs, the Commission had noted that that arrangement was in many ways responsive to the needs of Member States, particularly developing countries.
The Commission also agreed to reiterate its decision, taken in 2006, rejecting the use of NPOs in any regional roles.
The representative of CCISUA said that it was apparent that the use of NPOs was increasing in the common system and was especially prevalent in two organizations.
In staffing missions in the future,DPKO will use the experience gained at UNMIK and UNAMA to expand the use of NPOs where feasible and cost-effective.
On the basis of the data available, the use of NPOs had continued to grow since the Commission's previous review of the category in 2006.
The currently applied criteria(see paragraph 4) may be further reviewed with OHRM and other partners as relevant to allow the Secretariat, and DPKO in particular, to be in a better positionto develop flexible and creative staffing strategies in order to expand the use of NPOs in field missions.
At the same time, the Commission had wished to monitor carefully the use of NPOs and had requested CCAQ to provide annual reports on NPO utilization. 10/.
The use of NPOs was approved by the Office of Human Resources Management(OHRM); subsequently, on 23 December 2003, authority was delegated to the Department of Peacekeeping Operations(DPKO) to recruit NPOs in governance-oriented missions.
However, within that framework, it has been possible to increase significantly the use of NPOs in such missions as UNMIK and UNAMA, where there has been a demand for national expertise and local knowledge.
The use of NPOs should be further encouraged as being consistent with the changing focus of development assistance, both within and outside the United Nations system, towards a more participatory grass-roots approach.
During the discussions,it was noted that the organizations had yet to implement policy statements on the use of NPOs, and the Commission members encouraged the organizations to do so in accordance with the criteria for the use of NPOs. .
The greater use of NPOs in governance missions was considered both necessary and desirable in view of the expanded field of activities entrusted to those missions, which require national experience and local knowledge.
At another level,some members were of the view that the matter of the use of NPOs could not satisfactorily be resolved in isolation from an integrated overview of how the international civil service was responding to changing internal and external imperatives.
The greater use of NPOs in peacekeeping operations is limited by the conditions governing their employment, namely the requirement that their use be restricted to functions which have a national content and which require national experience and knowledge.
FICSA proposed that all organizations making use of NPOs or similar categories adopt a common grading structure, even if not all grades were used by all organizations at all duty stations.
Iii To specify that the use of NPOs at the eight headquarters duty stations was not consistent with the criteria and that their use in duty stations in developed countries might be allowed under limited circumstances where there was a need for national knowledge;
Others considered that the widespread use of NPOs might jeopardize the impartiality of the international civil service; even the perception that that were so might inhibit donor contributions.
The revised criteria for the employment of NPOs represented an appropriate framework for use at the current time and for the near future.
Reaffirm the criteria set out in 1994 for the employment of NPOs, updated to reflect the use of the new job evaluation system in the classification of positions in the category, as indicated in annex IX to the present report;
In that connection, a view was expressed that the Commission was revisiting a dilemma that had existed at the time of the introduction of NPOs and that their more widespread use had merely brought more sharply into focus.