Примеры использования Violation of his rights under article на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author claims that his deportation to Eritrea would constitute a violation of his rights under articles 7 and 18 of the Covenant.
As to the violation of his rights under article 26, the author has not explained how the issues are separate from those falling under article 19.
The author states that her son was subjected to torture and cruel, inhuman anddegrading treatment, in violation of his rights under article 7 of the Covenant.
He argues that the denial of registration amounted to a violation of his rights under article 19, in its failure to be"provided by law" and to pursue any legitimate aim, as understood under article 19, paragraph 3.
Furthermore, he states that he was the victim of repeated inspections, arrests andserious bodily injuries, in violation of his rights under articles 7; 9, paragraph 1; and 17 of the Covenant.
Regarding the author's claims of violation of his rights under article 19 of the Covenant, the Committee finds them sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility, declares them admissible and proceeds to their examination on the merits.
He reiterates that he spent seven years in"solitary confinement" andsubmits that the foregoing experience constitutes a violation of his rights under articles 7 and 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
The author also submitted that he was subjected to degrading treatment in violation of his rights under article 7 because, on 9 September 2010, during a court hearing in which he participated, the prosecutor violated the dress code for prosecutors.
The author claims that his forcible removal from Norway to Myanmar would put his life at risk and expose him to torture, in violation of his rights under article 7 of the Covenant.
The Committee notes that the author claims that there has been a violation of his rights under article 2 of the Covenant, without clarifying the nature of the violation of this provision.
In these circumstances due weight must be given to the author's allegations, andthe Committee considers that the facts presented by the author disclose a violation of his rights under article 7 of the Covenant.
The forcible return of the author to Tunisia would amount to a violation of his rights under article 7 in conjunction with article 2, of the Covenant.
The issue before the Committee is whether the denial of the required authorization of mass events that the author had planned with a group of Gomel city residents constitutes a violation of his rights under article 21 of the Covenant.
The author also claims a violation of his rights under article 7 and article 10, paragraph 1, because while he was detained in a temporary detention facility(IVS) he was beaten up on a few occasions by law-enforcement officers to force him to"start testifying against himself.
The courts could not justify the limitations imposed on his right of the freedom of expression and, thus,the fine imposed on him constitutes a violation of his rights under article 19 of the Covenant.
In case No. 1861/2009(Bakurov v. Russian Federation), the author claimed a violation of his rights under article 26 of the Covenant in that he was denied a trial by a jury while jury trials were granted to some other accused persons in courts in other regions of the Russian Federation.
The Committee takes notes of the author's allegations thathe was discriminated against, based on his Roma ethnicity, in violation of his rights under articles 14, paragraph 2, and26 of the Covenant.
The author further notes that the State party failed to address his arguments regarding the violation of his rights under article 14 of the Covenant, claiming that his allegations are unfounded without presenting any reasons other than the fact that he had had the right to appeal against the judgment and in fact did so.
The complainant argued that the judicial authorities had not taken measures to conduct a proper and effective investigation andpunish those responsible, in violation of his rights under articles 1, 2, 10 to 14 and 16 of the Convention.
The Committee further notes that the author also claims that there has been a violation of his rights under article 26 of the Covenant, as he was not afforded the option of having his case examined by a jury, whereas this option was offered to accused persons liable to the death penalty in other Russian regions.
In respect of issues under article 19, the Committee considers that the uncontested response of the authorities to the attempts of the author to expresshis opinions freely and to disseminate the political tenets of his party constitute a violation of his rights under article 19.
The Committee notes, first,that in the present case, the author claims a violation of his rights under article 2 of the Covenant, as he considers that the State party has failed to enact legislation that would provide him with effective protection from discrimination, as his status as an employee of Parliament precludes him from using the system for redress provided under the Canadian Human Rights Act.
The Committee notes the author's claims that he was held in"solitary confinement" and that the conditions of detention violated his rights under article 10of the Covenant and that as a political prisoner, he was discriminated against, in violation of his rights under article 26 of the Covenant.
The author claims that his torture and degrading treatment whilst in detention constitute a violation of his rights under article 7 of the Covenant(torture and degrading treatment in detention), and that the poor conditions of detention violated his rights under article 10, paragraphs 1(poor conditions in detention) and 2(a) detention with particularly dangerous convicts while waiting for his trial.
Since the author has not provided any information to the effect that jury trials have been held in death-penalty cases in the Murmansk Region to substantiate a difference in treatment between him and other accused persons,the Committee cannot conclude that there has been a violation of his rights under article 26 of the Covenant.
The Committee notes, however,that the author has already alleged a violation of his rights under article 21, resulting from the interpretation and application of the existing laws of the State party, and the Committee does not consider that examination of whether the State party also violated its general obligations under article 2, paragraph 2, of the Covenant, read in conjunction with article 21, to be distinct from examination of the violation of the author's rights under article 21 of the Covenant.
In respect of issues under article 19, the Committee is of the opinion that the uncontested response of the Zambian authorities to the author's attempts to express his opinions freely andto disseminate the tenets of the People's Redemption Organization constitute a violation of his rights under article 19 of the Covenant.
Accordingly, the Committee finds that it is precluded from examining the author's allegations regarding violations of his rights under articles 6, 7, 9, 14 and 17 of the Covenant.
The State party considers that,in such circumstances, violations of his rights under articles 7, 18 and 19 are not the necessary and foreseeable consequence of his removal.
In accordance with article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant, the author is entitled to an effective remedy, including compensation for his arbitrary arrest and detention,as well as for the violations of his rights under articles 12 and 19 of the Covenant.