Примеры использования When we adopted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
And that stopped when we adopted him.
When we adopted you, people kept asking questions, Very well-meant.
Do you remember when we adopted that baby.
When we adopted Tom, our whole family went to therapy, together and separately.
I well remember the excitement at the Millennium Summit in 2000, when we adopted the Millennium Declaration.
Sixty years ago when we adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, humanity had been wrested from the throes of war.
It is imperative that the international community bear in mind this factor,which was not so acute when we adopted the MDGs in the year 2000.
That effort began here three years ago, when we adopted the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime.
Fortunately, however, the context is totally different from the circumstances that prevailed last year when we adopted resolution 48/27.
When we adopted Agenda 21 at Rio, we knew thatwe were establishing a framework for a new relationship between human beings and nature.
The geostrategic balance and the development paradigm are now very different from what we faced 10 years ago when we adopted the MDGs.
When we adopted resolution 48/162,we did so in the full understanding and hope that all its provisions would be fully implemented in the spirit of partnership.
I felt that emotion again while I was President of the Conference on Disarmament in 1993, when we adopted the Convention on Chemical Weapons.
In May 2009, when we adopted the Programme of Work,we thought that we had achieved a real breakthrough which, in our view, should have paved the way for real negotiations.
This logic taking into account all factors controlled the moving forward the political modernization at the first place,too. We talked about this when we adopted the National Plan.
The Assembly may recall that when we adopted resolution 50/227,we did so with the conviction that its successful implementation required the implementation of all its provisions.
On taking the Chair of the Conference on Disarmament,I can hear still echoing in this Council chamber the optimistic applause that rang out at our meeting when we adopted our programme of work.
Five years ago, the First Committee began its journey towards an arms trade treaty, when we adopted a draft resolution that was subsequently blessed in the General Assembly resolution 61/89.
In 2005, when we adopted resolution 1593(2005), despite differences among us regarding the Court, the Council showed its will to not tolerate that the terrible crimes committed in Darfur go unpunished.
The world has changed profoundly since the first United Nations Conference on Human Settlements was held in Vancouver back in 1976, when we adopted a more sectoral and technical approach to the problems of human settlements.
In May of this year, when we adopted the programme of work,we thought that we had achieved a real breakthrough, which, in our view, should pave the way for real negotiations in the months ahead.
As I was saying, it is regrettable that we have adopted a document which is even more bland- andI use the term which was used yesterday by another delegation in the informal plenary meeting when we adopted the report- than in previous years.
When we adopted the 2001 Programme of Action on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons, we committed ourselves to undertaking the multilateral efforts required to effectively combat this scourge.
As members are aware,the commencement of those negotiations was agreed upon at the close of the previous Assembly session, when we adopted decision 62/557 in order to achieve a more democratic, representative, responsible, legitimate, effective, participatory and transparent Council.
If not, I think that we are going to have to wait for the melon to become sweeter. I think while we are waiting for the melon to become sweeter, it is important for us to maintain an atmosphere,the spirit which made us particularly happy on 29 May, when we adopted document CD/1864.
Nor when we adopted the Convention could we have foreseen the rapid developments in international environmental law that have taken place, including, for example, the growing entrenchment of the precautionary approach to ocean management and the increasing pressures on national, regional and global institutions in general.
He has been a moving force of the Conference on Disarmament for many years, at least for all the years that I have been here myself, andI must say that when we adopted the programme of work in CD/1864, my mission felt very grateful to Ambassador Rapacki for his inspiration in putting forward this approach of the P-6, which I found at a difficult time a key instrument to promote consensus within the Conference.
When we adopted the updated mandate of that Committee in 1992,we established the Committee, which existed for several years, with the approval of the French delegation and all the other delegations, because there was a consensus on the adoption of this decision in accordance with the rules of procedure, and that Committee was re-established several times after 1992.
For my delegation, it is imperative that such an instrument go beyond regulating the arms trade and also cover munitions,thus avoiding a repetition of the mistake we made in 2001 when we adopted the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects, which left out the important illegal munitions market that now poses a serious threat to a large number of countries.
When we adopt the Programme of Action,we sign a promise- a promise to allocate more resources next year than we did this year to health-care systems, to education, family planning and the struggle against AIDS.