Примеры использования Whose extraterritorial effects на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Government of Mali has neither promulgated norapplied laws or measures whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States.
The application of United States domestic laws whose extraterritorial effects infringe upon the sovereignty and legitimate interests of other States is inconsistent with the intentions of the Charter of the United Nations.
The Republic of Guyana has not promulgated orapplied any laws or regulations whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States.
We reaffirm that any decision whose extraterritorial effects may infringe upon the sovereignty of other States is in contravention of the principle of respect for State sovereignty, as set forth in Article 2 of the United Nations Charter.
The Government of Mali has neither promulgated norapplied laws or measures whose extraterritorial effects impinge on the sovereignty of other States.
Ukraine does not have any legislation or regulations whose extraterritorial effects could affect the sovereignty of other States and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction, or the freedom of trade and international navigation.
The Republic of Haiti has refrained from promulgating andapplying laws and regulations whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States.
The application of a United States domestic law whose extraterritorial effects infringe upon the sovereignty and legitimate interests of other States is inconsistent with the intentions of the Charter.
Accordingly, the Government of Algeria has neither promulgated norapplied any laws and/or regulations whose extraterritorial effects undermine the sovereignty of other States.
Uruguay has neither promulgated norapplied any law or regulation whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction, as well as the freedom of trade and navigation.
Accordingly, the Algerian Government has neither promulgated nor applied any laws and/or regulations whose extraterritorial effects would undermine the sovereignty of other States.
Ukraine does not have any legislation or regulations whose extraterritorial effects could affect the sovereignty of other States and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction, or freedom of trade and international navigation.
Accordingly, the Government of Algeria has neither promulgated nor applied any laws whose extraterritorial effects would undermine the sovereignty of other States.
Ukraine does not have any legislation or regulations whose extraterritorial effects could affect the sovereignty of other States and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction, or the freedom of trade and international navigation.
In this connection, it has neither promulgated norapplied laws or measures whose extraterritorial effects impinge on the sovereignty of other States.
The Government of the Republic of Malawi has not promulgated any legislation whose extraterritorial effects would infringe upon the sovereignty of other States, the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction or the freedom of trade and navigation.
It is a matter of principle that Indonesia has consistently expressed its opposition to the promulgation andapplication by one Member State of laws and measures whose extraterritorial effects impinge on the sovereignty of other Member States.
Venezuela has therefore opposed the promulgation andapplication of laws and regulations whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under its jurisdiction; it has termed such action unacceptable.
On many occasions, the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries has expressed its rejection both of this policy against one of its members and of the legislative instruments that support it,particularly the Helms-Burton Act, whose extraterritorial effects are also a violation of the sovereignty of all States.
Concerned about the promulgation andapplication by Member States of laws and regulations whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction, and the freedom of trade and navigation.
The Government of the Republic of Zambia supports the lifting of the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba andremains opposed to the Helms-Burton Law whose extraterritorial effects, inter alia, constitute a violation of international law and the sovereignty of Cuba.
The Government of the State of Qatar has neither promulgated norapplied any law or legislation whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction, or the freedom of trade or international navigation, nor has it taken any measures contrary to resolution 53/4.
The Government of Mali has neither promulgated norapplied laws or measures whose extraterritorial effects impinge on the sovereignty of other States.
Under the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly, a State Member must not promulgate or implement laws,regulations or measures whose extraterritorial effects would affect the sovereignty of other States Members or freedom of trade.
In the pursuit of international cooperation,no State should adopt unilateral coercive measures or legislations whose extraterritorial effects could damage the sovereignty and economic well-being of other States.
Through its resolutions 47/19 and 48/16, the General Assembly called on all States to refrain from promulgating andapplying laws and measures whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction, as well as the freedom of trade and navigation.
Australia has consistently expressed its principled opposition to the promulgation andapplication by States Members of the United Nations of laws and measures whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States, the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction and freedom of trade and navigation.
Australia has consistently expressed its principled opposition to the promulgation andapplication, by States Members of the United Nations, of laws and measures whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States, the legitimate interest of entities or persons under their jurisdiction as well as the freedom of trade and navigation.
In its resolutions 47/19, 48/16, 49/9 and 50/10, the General Assembly expresses its concern about the continued promulgation andapplication by Member States of laws and regulations whose extraterritorial effects affect the sovereignty of other States and the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction, as well as the freedom of trade and navigation.
In fulfilment of its commitment to the purposes and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and international law, Ghana has steadfastly refrained from promulgating orapplying laws whose extraterritorial effects adversely affect the sovereignty of other States, the legitimate interests of entities or persons under their jurisdiction or the freedom of trade and navigation.