Примеры использования Working group also recalled на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group also recalled the FEMA workshops conducted in 2007 and 2009.
The Working Group recalled the agreement of the Preparatory Committee at its 1998 session that the Advisory Committee, at its 1999 session, should reach agreement on the distribution of the remaining offices for UNISPACE III and the allocation of agenda items of UNISPACE III between Committee I andCommittee II. The Working Group also recalled that the Preparatory Committee had requested the executive secretariat to submit proposals to assist the Advisory Committee in considering those matters.c.
The Working Group also recalled that 2010 was the International Year of Biodiversity.
The Working Group also recalled that draft article 20(3) provided that there might be no standstill period under certain conditions.
The Working Group also recalled that it had been requested to continue to consider issues aimed at enhancing the mobility of staff and the portability of pensions.
The Working Group also recalled its decision that assignments for consumer purposes and certain practices that did not need to be regulated should be excluded.
The Working Group also recalled previous studies that show that the krill fishery does operate close to shore at times(WG-EMM-16/17; SC-CAMLR-XXXV/BG/14), including within 5 km of the coast.
The Working Group also recalled that the number of tagged fish available for recapture within each research block was based on a subset of data representing‘effective tag releases.
The Working Group also recalled the language in the second model statement to article 11 set out in the Annex to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2010, which reflected a similar principle.
The Working Group also recalled its advice(SC-CAMLR-XXXVI, Annex 7, paragraph 4.20) that Members develop methods towards the following issues regarding the characteristics of different gears.
The Working Group also recalled that the Commission had revised boundaries of management areas in the past to more clearly be associated with whole stocks e.g. Division 58.4.3b; CCAMLR-XX, paragraphs 7.16 to 7.20.
The Working Group also recalled, with reference to footnote 3, that real-life examples of the use of two-stage tendering as opposed to request for proposals with dialogue were still outstanding.
The Working Group also recalled the analysis from last year(paragraph 2.23) where vessel effect had a very small influence on variation in the length-frequency distributions from krill fishery observer data.
The Working Group also recalled the endorsement by the Scientific Committee of a process for having papers from non-Member scientists able to be submitted for consideration by the working groups SC-CAMLR-XXVII, paragraph 10.9.
The Working Group also recalled its request to other delegations to prepare their written inputs, and invited them to submit their contributions in good time so that these can also be examined at the second meeting.
The Working Group also recalled the agreement reached at its previous sessions that the text should be consistent with the Guide and in particular the recommendations of the Guide, while also offering options where necessary.
The Working Group also recalled that, under certain circumstances, widespread or systematic imprisonment or other severe deprivation of liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law might constitute crimes against humanity.
The Working Group also recalled that the value of time-series data collected under prescribed CEMP methodologies increases as the time series grows, and that reducing or stopping existing CEMP programs will severely compromise the ability to monitor change in the ecosystem.
The Working Group also recalled that the routine collection of gonad weight from biologically sampled fish would aid in understanding the biological factors that may influence stock movement patterns in exploratory fisheries SC-CAMLR-XXIX, Annex 8, paragraph 8.14 and Table 16.
The Working Group also recalled the decision taken at its sixth session that appropriate statements of the governing principles should be found in the Model Law, but that appropriate further guidance might usefully be provided in the Guide to Enactment A/CN.9/568, para. 24.
The Working Group also recalled that the rapid depletion of the southern area of the division had resulted in it being closed to fishing three years after the fishery commenced, and that no smaller size classes have so far been observed in the fishery, indicating there is unlikely to be recruitment to the area.
The Working Group also recalled that its mandate, as defined by the Commission at its forty-third session and referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 above, was to focus on the preparation of a legal standard on transparency in treaty-based investor-State arbitration.
The Working Group also recalled the agreement reached by it in 2006 on elements that could constitute the basis for consensus on specific recommendations and conclusions to be included in the report to be prepared by the Subcommittee at its forty-sixth session, in 2007 A/AC.105/871, annex III, para. 8.
The Working Group also recalled its findings that, owing to the lack of effective vetting procedures, in particular, some private military and security companies employed individuals who may have been involved in human rights abuses in the past and continued to be involved in human rights violations while employed by these companies.
The Working Group also recalled that the ideas, concepts and terminology used by CCAMLR to describe the spatial planning process and any level or levels of protection afforded by CAMLR conservation measures were to fulfil the objectives of CCAMLR as specified in Article II of the Convention and may not relate to terminology used elsewhere.
The Working Group also recalled that the executive secretariat would provide a compilation of the recommendations from the regional preparatory conferences for UNISPACE III and other comments to be received from Member States for consideration by the Advisory Committee, at its 1999 session, for inclusion in the draft report, the draft executive summary and the draft of the Vienna Declaration.b.
In that respect, the Working Group also recalled the appeal to all Governments made by the General Assembly in its resolution 46/122 to respond favourably to requests for contributions to the Fund, urged them and non-governmental organizations, other private and public entities and individuals to contribute to the Fund and encouraged them to do so to enable the Fund to fulfil its mandate effectively in 2004.
The Working Group also recalled the link to the Shared Environmental Information System(SEIS) and the European Union(EU) directive establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community(INSPIRE), as well as the obligations under the ECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters Aarhus Convention.
The Working Group also recalls General Assembly resolution 64/4 on the building of a peaceful and a better world through sport and the Olympic ideal.
The Working Group also recalls the judgement of the International Court of Justice in Belgium v. Senegal(2012) which states as follows.