Примеры использования Working group considers that it на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group considers that it is nonetheless in a position to render an Opinion on the case.
As to the allegations of violations of the right to a fair trial, the Working Group considers that it does not have sufficient information to give an opinion on the matter.
Therefore, the Working Group considers that it can no longer delay giving its Opinion on the communication submitted to it two years ago.
After having examined both the allegations by the source and the Government's reply, andnoting that the source has sent no observations in response, the Working Group considers that it does not possess sufficiently precise and consistent information to render an opinion on the case.
If the Working Group considers that it is unable to obtain enough information on the case,it shall decide to file the case;
As to the allegations of violations of the right to fair trial, the Working Group considers that it does not have sufficient information available to express an opinion in relation to them.
The Working Group considers that it is in a position to render its opinion on the detention of Mr. Al Hadidi, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
In the absence of any reply from the Government, the Working Group considers that it should issue an Opinion according to all the information put at its disposal.
The Working Group considers that it does not have sufficient information on the case and decides to file it under the terms of paragraph 17(d) of its methods of work. .
As far as the second category of information is concerned,that relating to the explanations regarding the nature of the activities of the detained persons, the Working group considers that it constitutes no more than an interpretation of facts of which the Group was already aware and which it had examined on the basis of the criteria set out in its methods of work. .
Nevertheless, the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render its opinion in accordance with paragraph 16 of its methods of work and its constant jurisprudence.
In the light of the above, andsubject to the subsequent receipt of pertinent information or clarifications, the Working Group considers that it cannot adopt an Opinion on the arbitrary or non-arbitrary nature of the detention of the above-mentioned individuals and decides, in accordance with rule 17(d) of its methods of work, to file the case provisionally.
In so doing, the Working Group considers that it has responded to the concern expressed by the Commission in its resolution 1998/53 and that it has complied with the request contained in paragraph 8 of that resolution.
Despite the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render its opinion on the detention of Mr. Abedini in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
The Working Group considers that it is thus not competent to rule on the arbitrariness of detentions resulting from violations imputed to investigators acting within the framework of an international investigation commission set up by the Security Council.
Despite the lack of information from the Government, the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render an opinion on Mr. Hassan's detention, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
Regarding these matters, the Working Group considers that it does not have a mandate to express a view on the conformity of a decision taken by an international court with the norms of international law.
Despite the absence of information from the Government, the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render an opinion on the detention of the Petitioners, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its revised methods of work. .
Despite the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render its opinion on the detention of Mr. Arulanandam, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
Despite the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group considers that it is in the position to render its opinion on the detention of Haytham al-Zaeetari, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
Despite the absence of information from the Government, the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render an opinion on the detention of Messrs. Al Karoui and Matri, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its revised methods of work. .
Despite the absence of any information from the two Governments, the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render its opinion on the detention of Mr. Yusuf and Mr. Ahmed in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
Despite the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group considers that it is in the position to render its opinion on the detention of the 20 persons subject to this case, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
Despite the absence of information from the Government, the Working Group considers that it is in a position to render its opinion on the detention of Mr. Al Heysah, Mr. Al Rawabedah, Mr. Assaf and Mr. Khoder in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
In regard to the alleged violations of the right to a fair trial, the Working Group considers that it is not in possession of sufficient information about violations which would be of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character.
The Working Group considered that it had fulfilled the mandate entrusted to it by the Joint Meeting in accordance with paragraph 74 of the report.
The working group considered that it was important in this regard to maintain the flexibility desired by the industry.
The Working Group considered that it would not be appropriate to require publishing an advance notice of the request of quotations in the light of the nature and low value of the subject matter of the procurement addressed by the article.
Due to the number of details andconsequential amendments that would have to be checked, the Working Group considered that it could not work on a different basis without written proposal, and agreed to work on the basis of the secretariat approach.