Примеры использования Working group considers it на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group considers it is in a position to provide an opinion on the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Al-Maleh.
The Working Group considers it is in a position to provide an Opinion on the deprivation of liberty suffered by Mr. U Ohn Than.
The detention of these two persons, in the circumstances,constitutes a violation of those rights, so that the Working Group considers it to have been arbitrary, in accordance with Category II of its methods of work. .
In the present case, the Working Group considers it necessary to render an opinion on the arbitrary nature of the detention.
Люди также переводят
To be able to spell out the law applicable to the different issues raised by the source and identify the Government(s) responsible under international law for the legality of the detention and the possible violation, if any,of the rights of Mr. Tariq Aziz, the Working Group considers it necessary to highlight the particularity of the circumstances of the case before it. .
The Working Group considers it important to collect and present information with participants' feedback on activities carried out under the Assistance Programme.
Furthermore, and in accordance with paragraph 33(a) of its revised methods of work(A/HRC/16/47 and Corr.1,annex), the Working Group considers it appropriate to refer the allegation of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment to the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, for appropriate action.
The Working Group considers it is in a position to render its opinion on the detention of Mr. Abdelhalem in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
Given that intergovernmental organizations, such as the United Nations, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO), the European Union andothers are using the services of PMSCs, the Working Group considers it important to establish a framework by which such organizations may adhere to the convention within the limits of their competence with respect to PMSCs, their activities and personnel.
The Working Group considers it pertinent to remind the Government of Saudi Arabia that the prohibition of arbitrary detention is part of customary international law.
Despite the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group considers it is in the position to render its opinion on the detentions of Mr Musa in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
If the working group considers it appropriate, and in consultation with OHCHR, chairpersons should be provided with the necessary financial resources to undertake these tasks.
Despite the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group considers it is in a position to render its Opinion on the detention of Mr. Al Khodr in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
The Working Group considers it pertinent to remind the Government of the United Arab Emirates that the prohibition of arbitrary detention is part of customary international law.
Despite the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group considers it is in the position to render its opinion on the detentions of the 48 individuals in conformity with paragraph 16 of its methods of work. .
The Working Group considers it important that the Contingent-Owned Equipment Manual be available in all six official languages of the Organization and, therefore, recommends its distribution as an official United Nations document.
Even in the absence of any information from the Government, the Working Group considers it is in the position to render an Opinion on the detentions of the persons mentioned above, in conformity with paragraph 16 of its Methods of Work. .
When the Working Group considers it appropriate, it may require from the State, the original source or any other sources any relevant information on the matter that would permit it to assess the situation and the effectiveness of the measures taken by the State in response to its communications.
Having studied and analysed the material before it, the Working Group considers it appropriate to group these submissions, based on similarities in the arrest and detention of these individuals, and address each group separately as follows.
The Working Group considers it appropriate to recall that the obstacles to overcoming racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and achieving racial equality lie mainly in the lack of political will, weak legislation, and lack of implementation strategies and concrete action by States.
In accordance with article 33(a) of its methods of work(A/HRC/16/47 and Corr.1,annex), the Working Group considers it appropriate to refer the allegations of torture to the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, for appropriate action.
In this regard, the Working Group considers it of particular importance that national action plans highlight the way in which States are taking human rights into account in their public procurement processes and in the activities of export credit agencies.
In accordance with article 33(a) of its methods of work(A/HRC/16/47 and Corr.1,annex), the Working Group considers it appropriate to refer the allegations of torture to the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment for appropriate action.
Finally, the Working Group considers it most useful to reiterate its concern over the deprivation of liberty imposed arbitrarily, and the fact that a still considerable number of persons are frequently unable to benefit from legal resources and guarantees to which they are entitled for the conduct of their defence by law and by applicable human rights instruments.
Under the circumstances, and in order tocomply with the instructions given in Commission resolution 2003/68, the Working Group considers it worthwhile contributing to the definition under international law of the legal framework governing detention as part of efforts to combat terrorism, by clarifying its position on a number of matters falling within its mandate that are currently the subject of debate.
The Working Group considers it necessary to reiterate that some States continue to use deprivation of liberty without charges or trial or other applicable procedural guarantees against persons accused of terrorist acts in the context of the implementation of criminal policies against terrorism, a practice which is contrary to international human rights instruments.
In order to obtain a balanced picture, the Working Group considers it essential to hold information-gathering meetings with both official and civil society sources, especially those concentrating on the search for victims of enforced disappearance.
However, the Working Group considers it necessary to reiterate that some States continue to use deprivation of liberty without charges or trial or other applicable procedural guarantees against persons accused of terrorist acts in the implementation of criminal policies against terrorism, a practice which is contrary to international human rights instruments.
Therefore, for the time being andnotwithstanding further additions, the Working Group considers it advisable to set up a list of principles in conformity with articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which may be used in relation to deprivation of liberty of persons accused of acts of terrorism.