Приклади вживання Aristocracies Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Aristocracies are not always wise;
But they have been, without any exception, aristocracies of public functionaries.
In aristocracies, readers are difficult and few;
However, the liberal philosophers deal only with a state whichhas nothing in common with these governments of corrupt courts and aristocracies.
In aristocracies readers are fastidious and few in number;
The men who live in democratic countries do not value those sorts of unsophisticated,turbulent and crude diversions to which the people devote themselves in aristocracies;
In aristocracies the rich are at the same time those who govern.
A very similar survey of the various forms of government can be found in the Statesman, where Plato discusses'the origin of the tyrant and king,of oligarchies and aristocracies, and of democracies'[21].
In aristocracies men often have a greatness and a strength that is their own.
The first of these steps is Oriental despotism,the second is formed by the Greek and Roman democracies and aristocracies, and the third, and highest, is the Germanic Monarchy, which of course is an absolute monarchy.
Aristocracies are not always wise; kings are often foolish; Popes.
This expansive power has been transmitted from the simple a priori governments to the mixed or de facto types,such as democracies and aristocracies, democratic empires and constitutional monarchies, which have all remained faithful in this respect to their ideal.
In aristocracies, the servant occupies a subordinate position that he cannot leave;
It is important to note that Plato explicitely identified this best and oldest among the existing states with the Dorian constitution of Spartaand Crete, and that these two tribal aristocracies did in fact represent the oldest forms of political life within Greece.
In aristocracies a servant fills a subordinate position which he cannot get out of;
So with the spread of the Industrial Revolution the aristocracies weren't just the economic losers; they also risked becoming political losers, losing their hold on political power.
In aristocracies, language must naturally partake of that state of repose in which everything remains.
These communal aristocracies, based on slavery, could not have existed for a moment without it.
In aristocracies, the servant and the master see each other only from time to time, and they often speak only by intermediary.
The same fate awaits aristocracies, democracies, and all the-cracies, the gangrene of the nations, the bugbears of liberty.
In aristocracies, then, the father is not only the civil head of the family, but the organ of its traditions, the expounder of its customs, the arbiter of its manners.
The opposite is seen in aristocracies where the money of the State profits above all the class that leads public affairs.
From feudal aristocracies to industrialised empires, the engine of history has always been the conflict between constantly revolutionising technologies and prevailing class conventions.
The French and English aristocracies were called, given their historical position, to write pamphlets against modern bourgeois society.
In aristocracies the master often exercises, even without being aware of it, an amazing sway over the opinions, the habits, and the manners of those who obey him, and his influence extends even further than his authority.
Even among aristocracies, the Anglo-Irish was notoriously improvident and devil-may-care in its outlook.
The master, in aristocracies, often exercises, even without his knowing it, a prodigious sway over the opinions, habits, and mores of those who obey him; and his influence extends very much further than even his authority.