Приклади вживання Editor must Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The editor must be cringing.
When submitting an ethical complaint regarding a given manuscript orpublished article, the editor must take reasonable steps in co-operation with the publisher(or society).
The editor must respect the intellectual independence of the authors.
When submitting an ethical complaint regarding a given manuscript ora published article, the editor must take reasonable responses in cooperation with the publisher(or society).
An editor must study the manuscripts submitted for publication without delay.
An editor must as quick as possible examine manuscripts, presented to the publication.
The editor must review the manuscripts submitted for publication within the shortest possible time.
The Editor must ensure that information regarding the manuscript is kept confidential.
Managing editor must notify the corresponding author about the results of review not later than in a week.
The editor must keep confidential information and ideas contained in scientific manuscripts and not use them for personal purposes.
A journalist and editor must have well-founded reasons to cover the private life of minors and permission from parents or guardians.
The editor must have a system to ensure that peer reviewers' identity is protected unless they use an open review system that is expressed to authors and reviewers.
The editor must use appropriate peer reviewers for the publication script by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding people with conflicts of interest.
Editors must obey laws on confidentiality in their own jurisdiction.
Editors must ensure a fair double-blind peer-review of the articles submitted for publication.
Editors must preserve anonymity of reviewers.
The Editors must ensure that each manuscript is an original work.
Responsible editors must comply with the law of confidentiality in the jurisdiction to which they are directly related.
Authors, reviewers, and editors must declare potential competing interests, or interests that may be perceived as such, as they relate to the research.
The authors and editors must agree to the secondary publication of previously published materials, if a new work contains another interpretation of the original data.
Editors must act if they suspect a violation, whether a paper is published or not, and make all reasonable efforts to continue to get a resolution to the problem.
The editors must make clear to their reviewers that the manuscripts sent for the review are privileged communications and are the private property of the authors.
Editors must use peer reviewers who are appropriate for papers considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those who have conflicts of interest.
Editors must preserve the confidentiality of the reviewers' personal data except when the independent review system is open.
Responsible editors must respond quickly to complaints and do their utmost to satisfy the inquiries of those who are not satisfied with the complaint.
Editors must obey laws on confidentiality that are in force in their own jurisdiction.
If the competition of interests was revealed after the publication of the article, the editors must ensure the publication of amendments.
If a journal operates a system where peer reviewers are chosen by editors(rather thanposting papers for all to comment as a pre-print version), editors must protect the confidentiality of authors' material and remind reviewers to do so as well.