Приклади вживання Lethal autonomous Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Why we should ban lethal autonomous weapons?
Some lethal autonomous weapons are already in use.
I don't evenwant to think what"error" means in the context of lethal autonomous weapons.
Lethal autonomous weapons systems do not exist today.
It asks signatories to“neither participate in nor support the development, manufacture, trade,or use of lethal autonomous weapons.”.
The letter states,“lethal autonomous weapons threaten to become the third revolution in warfare.
The signatories pledge to“neither participate in nor support the development, manufacture, trade,or use of lethal autonomous weapons.”.
In their letter, they warn that“lethal autonomous weapons threaten to become the third revolution in warfare.
At the beginning of this year, 116 luminaries from the world of technology have signed anopen letter calling for the UN to prevent"lethal Autonomous weapons systems".
After the development, lethal Autonomous weapons will make armed conflicts more and faster than ever.
I would like to reaffirmthat KAIST does not have any intention to engage in development of lethal autonomous weapons systems and killer robots,” Shin said in a statement.
Lethal autonomous weapons threaten to become the third revolution in warfare[after gunpowder and nuclear weapons].
I would like to reaffirmthat KAIST does not have any intention to engage in development of lethal autonomous weapons systems and killer robots,” Shin said in a statement.
Lethal autonomous weapons threaten to become the third revolution in warfare[after the invention of gunpowder and nuclear bombs].
We, the undersigned, call upon governments and government leaders to create a future with strong international norms,regulations and laws against lethal autonomous weapons.
Once developed, lethal autonomous weapons will permit armed conflict to be fought at a scale greater than ever, and at timescales faster than humans can comprehend.
Thousands of people have now signed a pledge declaring that"we opt to hold ourselves to a high standard: we will neither participate in nor support the development, manufacture, trade,or use of lethal autonomous weapons.".
Many experts warn that lethal autonomous weapons would violate fundamental legal and ethical principles and would be a destabilising threat to international peace and security.
In the agreement it was written that“These currently being absent, we opt to hold ourselves to a high standard: we will neither participate in nor support the development, manufacture, trade,or use of lethal autonomous weapons.
The latter of which boasts that it has tested lethal autonomous ground robots as guards for missile sites and is developing a crewless versionof the Armata T-14 tank.
These systems, known as LAWS(Lethal Autonomous Weapons), are under development, and it will only be a matter of time before they're tacked onto pre-existing weapons, including powerful munitions and nuclear warheads.
The international community started to debate the emerging technology of lethal autonomous weapons systems(LAWS) in the framework of the United Nations Convention on Conventional Weapon(CCW) in 2014.
It says:"Autonomous lethal weapons threaten to become the third revolution in the war.
It has not evenbeen able to agree on a definition of fully autonomous lethal weapons.
In effect, the directive constitutes the world's first moratorium on lethal fully autonomous weapons.
The timing on this patent is perfect: The UN is currently meeting to decidewhether to restrict or possibly even ban the development of autonomous lethal weapons, and what level of“meaningful human control” such weapons should have.