Приклади вживання The government argued Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Government argued that this claim should be rejected.
The Government argued that the interference served to protect the rights of others.
In respect of the procedure for“pre-trial taking of evidence”, the Government argued that this was not a reasonable alternative in the case of anonymous comments.
The government argued that such a measure prevents the concentration of land in one's hands.
Even if the ghostwritten op-ed were entirely accurate, fair, and balanced, it would be a violation of this Court's November8 Order if it had been publish,” the government argued.
The government argued that such a measure prevents the concentration of land in one's hands.
While acknowledging that there was no effective means in Romanian law of challenging the Supreme Court ofJustice's judgment of 1 March 1995, the Government argued that it was open to the applicant to bring a new action for recovery of possession.
The government argued that such a measure prevents the concentration of land in one's hands.
As to the question whether the applicants had beendenied access to any relevant documents which existed, the Government argued that the Commission's conclusions on Rule 6 of the 1981 Rules were wrong, pointing out:.
The government argued that the former dictator should not be placed anywhere he could be glorified.
Muslim principles of social progress, equality and justice, which the government argued formed the core of scientific socialism and its own accent on self-sufficiency, public participation and popular control, as well as direct ownership of the means of production.
The Government argued that the rights under Article 8 were not engaged as the right to private life did not include a right to die.
However, the Government argued that the authorities had conducted a thorough and effective investigation and found no irregularities.
In addition, the Government argued that the increase would mean probate fees could help fund improvements in the court service.
The Government argued that, in the circumstances, her application was inadmissible ratione materiae and thus did not have to be examined by the Court.
The Government argued that the applicant should have raised her complaint under Article 2 of the Convention within six months of that date.
The Government argued that it had been open to the first applicant to claim compensation at the national level in respect of his deprivation of liberty.
The Government argued that the applicant should have raised her complaint under Article 2 of the Convention within six months of that date, but had failed to do so.
But the government argued they were necessary to ensure adequate funding for the court service and access to justice in the long term.
The Government argued that the applicant could not be regarded as a refugee since he was not persecuted in Ukraine and faced no threat of persecution.
The Government argued that the obligation to avoid causing harm had a clear basis in law and was confirmed by comprehensive case-law(see paragraphs 31 to 39 above).
The government argued that the proposed amendments would help to eliminate holes in legislation so that Hong Kong would cease to be a haven for criminals from neighboring countries.
The Government argued that the publication had contained serious factual allegations directed against a prominent public figure who had contributed to the development of sports in Ukraine.
The Government argued that the Federal Constitutional Court set aside the decisions of the Münster District Court of 17 December 2001 and the Hamm Court of Appeal of 1 March 2002 and that for that reason the interference with the applicants' rights ceased to exist.
The Government argued that the applicants had not shown that the expenses had been incurred in connection with the violations alleged; that there were not enough documents to prove that the applicants had actually paid the lawyers' bills; and that the bills themselves were inflated.