Приклади вживання The government considered Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Government considered this amount reasonable.
Production would be restricted precisely in those other- regimented- branches which the government considered so important that it interfered with the conduct of their affairs.
The Government considered the applicant's claim excessive.
Given that the GPO had performed many investigative activities in the case, the Government considered that the investigation had been sufficiently effective.
The Government considered the decisions to extend sanctions, provided its proposals to the NSDC.
Given that the applicants hadlodged their complaints on 29 September 2005, the Government considered that the applications were inadmissible in the part relating to the applicants' complaints about the absence of an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Article 2 of the Convention.
The Government considered that these complaints were inadmissible because of the applicants' non-compliance with the six-month rule.
Furthermore, the government considered covering the cost of installing air conditioners in schools.
The Government considered that claim to be unsubstantiated as there had been no violation of the applicant's rights, and, in any event, excessive.
Lastly, the Government considered that the sum the applicant company had been ordered to pay L.
As regards the claim for past loss, the Government considered that some of the claims were entirely unsubstantiated and that others contained wrong calculations or lacked evidence.
In 2010, the government considered the initial public offering of shares at the London Stock Exchange; however, this plan was postponed.
As to the second set of proceedings, the Government considered that their length did not exceed a reasonable time within the meaning of Article 6§ 1 of the Convention, because it amounted to one year and four months.
The Government considered that the applicant's behaviour in this whole matter was incompatible with his wish to acquire the status of parliamentarian.
Naturally, the question arises whether the government considered any other options, other reserves to ensure the sustainability of the pension system without raising the retirement age. Of course yes. Of course, considered. .
The Government considered the sum claimed by the applicant exorbitant, regard being had to the cost of living and level of income in Ukraine at present.
The Government considered that the applicant had not complied with the six months rule as he only lodged his application with the Court on 16 May 2001.
The Government considered that the applicant and his lawyer had the opportunity to challenge the lawfulness of the applicant's detention and had taken this up.
The Government considered that, in the circumstances, any finding by the Court that there had been a violation of Article 8 would in itself constitute just satisfaction.
The Government considered that the applicant had failed to exhaust all of the domestic remedies available to him under Ukrainian law before lodging his application with the Court.
The Government considered that the grounds for refusing to register the applicant were based on the submission of inaccurate information and not on the applicant's place of residence as such.
Furthermore, the Government considered that the State's enacting of a regulation providing for mandatory identification of commentators on an Internet portal would constitute an excessive interference.
The Government considered that the Cologne Court of Appeal had already dealt in detail with the history and the interpretation of the Two-Plus-Four Treaty and of the Agreement of 27 and 28 September 1990.
The Government considered the applicant to suffer from serious psychological problems, including a mixed personality disorder, as shown, for instance, by his aggressiveness and difficulties in controlling his behaviour towards the conciliators.
The Government considered that although the applicant had indeed sought relief, he had not used the remedies which would have been effective for obtaining compensation for the damage he had suffered as a result of his letters being unlawfully opened.
The Government considered that this complaint is incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of Article 6§ 1 of the Convention as the procedure constituted the determination of neither a criminal charge nor“civil rights and obligations”.
However, the Government considered that the applicant's involvement in the bankruptcy proceedings would have given him added advantages as his claims would have been freed from the court injunction barring debt recovery from the Company and would have been satisfied as second in line.
The Government considers the situation with the arrears of wages to doctors and teachers unacceptable.