Приклади вживання These debates Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Enough of these debates.
Yet there has been a certain asymmetry in these debates.
The results of these debates were mixed.
You will write a paper on one of these debates.
Each of these debates and differences requires separate consideration.
Who is right in all these debates?
Of course, these debates aren't just about the fine points of benchmarking.
Because of concerns about vandalism and appropriateness of content, most wikis require policies regarding inclusion.[7] Wikipedia has developed spaces for policy andconflict resolution regarding the disputes for individual articles.[8] These debates, which can be initiated by anyone,[9][10] take place on an"Articles for deletion" page[5](often referred to by editors as an AfD).
We see in these debates a mad rush to impose a limit on what should be said, and what should not.
Another important characteristic of these debates is that they were conducted in English.
If these debates took place in a year, they would have been poisoned by disagreements related to the war in Iraq.”.
What I want to persuade you of today is of a very simple claim, which is that these debates are in a certain sense preposterous, because there is no such thing as religion about which to make these claims.
These debates however, have largely taken place outside Zionist organizations, and within Israeli national politics.
What happened historically in these debates- and this is the fourth similarity- was that those holding the‘state-oriented' position won out.
These debates are complicated by the fact that LINERs are found in a wide variety of objects with different brightnesses and morphologies.
Further, a second main theme from these debates is that reports about emotions, knowledge, expectations, and opinions are not always accurate.
These debates illustrate an inability to value the other critical historic roles NATO has played and can continue to play.
Through engaging in these debates students will gain the very important undergraduate skill of critical understanding.
Despite these debates, I think there are two reasons why the time is right for social researchers to reconsider non-probability sampling.
Indeed, some of these debates are currently reproduced in numerous international organisations and negotiations worldwide.
Despite these debates, however, it would be unreasonable to say that researchers can't learn anything from studying undergraduate students.
In these debates, many ask whether President Obama would risk losing Chicago, New York and Washington to protect Riga, Tallinn and Vilnius.
These debates rarely resolve because consequentialists offer arguments about ends, arguments that are not convincing to deontologists who are worried about means.
Time will tell how these debates shake out, particularly before the party's 20th National Congress in 2022, which will decide whether to extend Xi's leadership through the 2020s and possibly beyond.
In the past, these debates about external validity were frequently just a bunch of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures were done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different people.
In the past, these debates about external validity frequently involved nothing more than a group of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures had been done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different participants.
Time will tell how these debates shake out, particularly in the run-up to the party's 20th National Congress in 2022, which will make the crucial decision about whether to extend Xi's leadership term beyond previous term limits- through the 2020s and possibly beyond.
We regard these debates as, indeed, the opportunity for dialogue between opponents, not monologue, as it was during the previous debates, when incumbent candidate told learned by heart thesises, and there were no possibility to ask opponents questions and thus better explain viewpoint on the topic and problems'.
He makes the point these debates go on all the time with respect to art movements and periods, which is not to say they are not important.[13] The close of the period of postmodern art has been dated to the end of the 1980s, when the word postmodernism lost much of its critical resonance, and art practices began to address the impact of globalization and new media.[14].