Примери за използване на Applicant's argument на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
OHIM disputes the applicant's arguments.
The applicant's argument cannot therefore succeed.
The Commission disputes the applicant's arguments.
The applicant's arguments cannot cast any doubt on that conclusion.
The CPVO and the intervener dispute the applicant's arguments.
The thrust of the Applicant's arguments is based on teleological argumentation.
The Commission and the intervener dispute the applicant's arguments.
The applicant's argument concerning the irregularity of the consultation procedure falls into two parts.
The Council, supported by the Commission,disputes the applicant's arguments.
OHIM rejects the applicant's arguments as regards the alleged obligation to take into account documents submitted out of time.
The Council, supported by the intervening companies,contests the applicant's arguments.
In that regard, the Board of Appeal rejected the applicant's argument regarding the difference in colour between the maple leaf in the mark sought and the Canadian emblem.
The fourth ground of appeal alleges disregard by the General Court of the obligation to state reasons, both as regards the identification of the measure at issue andthe lack of discussion of the applicant's arguments based on the Frucona Košice judgment.
Accordingly, it is not necessary to consider the applicant's arguments alleging infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and(g) of Regulation No 40/94.
The applicant's arguments relating to the descriptive character of the contested mark must therefore be rejected in respect of‘bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use;
In addition, it considers that, having regard to the nature of the pension scheme for Community officials, the applicant's arguments concerning the allegedly insufficient amount of the Member States' contributions is erroneous.
Accordingly, the applicant's arguments that the listing criterion stated by Decision 2014/119 does not achieve other CFSP objectives are ineffective.
The Court, noting that the target audience of the publication at issue was adolescent children and dismissing the applicant's argument that the publication was in free circulation in the majority of Council of Europe member states, allowed the state a very broad margin of appreciation.
The applicant's argument that the Board of Appeal's finding in paragraph 17 of the contested decision was incorrect must therefore be rejected as irrelevant.
However, it considers it appropriate to address also the applicant's argument that the manner in which the evidence was obtained and the use made of it undermined his right not to incriminate himself.
Indeed, the applicant's arguments are essentially limited to a description of the general competitive pressure exerted by Ryanair and the other low-cost airlines on traditional airlines.
The Court must also reject the applicant's argument that the reasons stated for his listing no longer include the offence of illegal transfer of Ukrainian State funds outside Ukraine.
The applicant's argument that traditional manufacturing methods as well as excipients widely used are sufficient to demonstrate the bridging between Furosemide Vitabalans and other furosemide products cannot be accepted.
The court further stated that the applicant's argument concerning his family could not serve as a ground for his release and added that he should have thought about his family before committing the crime.
The applicant's arguments relating to the existence of five methods of achieving interoperability between its operating systems and its competitors' systems will be analysed when the Court examines what is claimed to be the indispensable nature of the interoperability information.
Without its being necessary to discuss the applicant's arguments relating to the purpose of the Regulation in any detail, it may be concluded that the applicant has failed to demonstrate the existence of a prima facie case.
Consequently, the applicant's argument that the Commission infringed its duty of care, in so far as it did not make an independent determination of the amount of the guarantee, cannot succeed.
Nor was there any substance in the applicant's argument that, since a conscripted man had not volunteered to come within the jurisdiction of the military authorities, any disciplinary measure imposed upon him in fact had a criminal character.
As regards the applicant's argument that the discontinuance charge cannot be regarded as part of the one-off charge for wholesale access, it must be pointed out that, until 10 February 1999, the applicant itself included the discontinuance charge in the cost of taking over a connection which it charged its competitors.
Next, the Court must also reject the applicant's argument that, on the one hand, it is not claimed that the real property that was allegedly misappropriated has been sold or can no longer be otherwise recovered and, on the other, there is no justification for a freezing of funds that exceed the value of the assets allegedly misappropriated, as that value is indicated in the letter of 10 October 2014.