Примери за използване на Courts should на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
That is, the courts should.
The courts should remain an option of the last resort.
Existing VIP rights for investors and corporate courts should be abolished.
The courts should ensure that war crimes are addressed.
But the ruling makes it clear that courts should reject spurious and weak evidence, she adds.
The recommendations also detail the scope of the procedure andthe form in which national courts should submit their referral.
The internal functioning of the courts should be the exclusive responsibility of the judiciary.
For further development in line with the principle of separation of powers,the administration of courts should be separated from the executive power.
Random assignment of cases in courts should be ensured by an effective nationwide system.
Courts should have the necessary instruments available to act swiftly and freeze the assets of the debtor or alleged debtor, however not under any circumstances.
The reasons for having rules on service include the fact that courts should be able to rely upon a document reaching the person to whom it is addressed.
However, the courts should take into account any other written form of opposition if it is expressed in a clear manner.
A number of questions are covered in the handbook, including:at what stage of proceedings before national courts should human rights violations be pleaded under the European Convention of Human Rights;
National courts should also be able to order that evidence be disclosed by third parties, including public authorities.
To prevent the destruction of relevant evidence andto ensure that court orders requesting disclosure are complied with, national courts should be able to impose sufficiently deterrent sanctions.
The member states and national courts should adhere to the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights.
In the interest of consistency between judgments resulting from related proceedings and hence to avoid the harm caused by the infringement of Union or national competition law not being fully compensated or the infringer being required to pay damages to compensate for harm that has not been suffered,national courts should have the power to estimate the proportion of any overcharge which was suffered by the direct or indirect purchasers in disputes pending before them.
Moreover, the courts should be able to draw the parties' attention to the possibility of mediation whenever this is appropriate".
Regarding the quantification of the passing-on,the proposal provides that national courts should have the power to estimate which share of the overcharge has been passed on to the level of indirect purchasers in the dispute.
National courts should therefore have at their disposal a range of measures to protect such confidential information from being disclosed during the proceedings.
Therefore the competent national courts should take into account the recommendation by the supervisory authority initiating the fine.
Those courts should exercise full jurisdiction, which should include jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to the dispute before them.
As regards the quantification of passing-on,national courts should have the power to estimate which share of the overcharge has been passed on to the level of indirect purchasers in disputes pending before them.
These courts should exercise full jurisdiction, which should include the authority to examine all the factual and legal issues relating to the case pending before them.
In its response, the ECJ said Polish courts should determine whether the chamber and the National Council of the Judiciary, which is responsible for judicial appointments, are"sufficiently independent.".
Courts should cooperate, in particular, by exchanging information, coordinating, where appropriate, the appointment of liquidators which can cooperate with each other, and approving protocols put before them by the liquidators.
In order to solve conflicts,national courts should take into consideration the whole body of rules under national law and apply the methods of interpretation recognised by those rules.
National courts should take into account the recommendation by the supervisory authority initiating the fine.
Implementation of such courts should be preceded, however, by the development of procedural rules(administrative, civil and criminal) tailored to meet the requirements of the new system.
In particular, national courts should be able to ask the Commission for information or for its opinion on points concerning the application of State aid rules.