Примери за използване на Evaluating the efficacy на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Novartis announced the positive news from the PREVENT study evaluating the efficacy….
No studies have been performed evaluating the efficacy and safety of Tecfidera when switching patients from other disease modifying therapies to Tecfidera.
BABOR never has and never will conduct animal testing when evaluating the efficacy of new active ingredient complexes.
In a 2014 study evaluating the efficacy of methotrexate in Alopecia,the researchers found that hair regeneration of more than 50% occurred in 67% of patients.
For the majority of the indications, there is clinical data evaluating the efficacy of the posology of 10 mg three times a day.
Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of St. John's wort in depression have commonly used 900 mg of extract daily in 3 divided doses, both in short-term treatment and for ongoing therapy, for periods of up to 1 year(range, 600 to 1,200 mg/day).
Demonstration of efficacy is based on a randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of Chondrocelect in patients with lesions between 1-5cm².
GS-US-312-0123 a phase 3, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for previously untreated CLL GS-US-313-0124 a phase 3, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with rituximab for previously treated iNHL GS-US-313-0125 a phase 3, randomised,double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for previously treated iNHL.
Treatment-naïve Metastatic Renal cell Carcinoma(MRCC) A phase 3 randomized, multicenter, international,study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sunitinib compared with IFN-α in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic RCC was conducted.
In order to further confirm the safety and efficacy of rucaparib in the treatment of platinum sensitive, relapsed or progressive, BRCA mutated(germline and/ or somatic), high-grade epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, the MAH should submit the results of study CO-338-043(ARIEL4), a phase 3,multicentre, open-label, randomised study evaluating the efficacy and safety of rucaparib versus chemotherapy for treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer.
A Phase 3, randomised, multi-centre,international study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sunitinib compared with IFN- in treatment-naïve MRCC patients was conducted.
A confirmatory, open-label, single-arm, multi-centre study evaluating the efficacy and safety of SUTENT was conducted in patients with MRCC who were refractory to prior cytokine therapy.
In order to confirm the efficacy and safety of OCALIVA, the MAH should conduct and submit the results of study 747-401, a double-blind, randomised,placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of OCALIVA in patients with PBC and moderate to severe hepatic impairment.
This was a phase II randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Avastin in combination with 5-FU/FA as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in patients who were not optimal candidates for first-line irinotecan treatment.
Post-authorisation efficacy study(PAES): In order to further define the efficacy and safety of Oncaspar in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, the MAH should submit the results of a multicentre,open label single arm phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of treatment regimens including Oncaspar in adults(aged 18-60) with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
A Phase 4 multinational, multi-centre, single-arm,open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sunitinib was conducted in patients with progressive, advanced/metastatic, well-differentiated, unresectable pNET.
GS-US-313-0124 a phase 3, randomised,double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with rituximab for previously treated iNHL;
Novartis announced the positive news from the PREVENT study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Cosentyx, one of the company's fastest-selling drugs in patients with non-radiographic axial spondylarthritis.
GS-US-312-0123 a phase 3, randomised,double blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for previously untreated CLL;
Our application was based on the findings from a broad clinical development program evaluating the efficacy and safety of ZEPATIER across diverse populations of patients with chronic hepatitis C, including patients with compensated cirrhosis and those with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease.”.
This study evaluated the efficacy of Me.
This study evaluated the efficacy of Me.
Only one study evaluated the efficacy of CPA/EE(2mg/0.035mg) versus placebo.
Two studies evaluated the efficacy of VIRAMUNE to prevent vertical transmission of HIV-1 infection.
Another study evaluated the efficacy of curcumin as maintenance therapy in 89 patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis.
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled,multicentre study evaluated the efficacy and safety of epoetin alfa in adult anaemic subjects with low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS.
SPIRIT evaluated the efficacy of infliximab induction therapy in 249 patients with plaque psoriasis that had previously received PUVA or systemic therapy.
Phase 3 trial TMC114IFD3013(EMERALD) evaluated the efficacy of Symtuza in virologicallysuppressed(HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL) HIV-1 infected patients.
All three Phase 3 studies evaluated the efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin.