Примери за използване на Examined together на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
They should be examined together.
To avoid prejudging the latter issues,both questions should be examined together.
In practice, these factors are often examined together since they are closely intertwined.
The applicants' arguments that the subject-matter of these two decisions is disproportionately wide can therefore be examined together.
They call for it to be examined together with standard treatments, to look for synergistic results.
For this reason, they should be examined together.
The fifth and sixth questions may be examined together since they both relate to problems of temporal application, from different aspects.
The first and third parts should be examined together.
By the first two questions,which can be examined together, the referring court seeks, in essence, to ascertain.
Up to 15 individual samples can be added to a total pool of 100 samples and examined together with these samples.
However, the General Court rejected the first andsecond pleas, which it examined together, and subsequently the third and fourth pleas, for the reasons set out respectively in paragraphs 104 to 156, 163 to 173 and 177 to 180 of the judgment set aside.
That is why doctors strongly recommendall couples planning to in the near future to become parents,to be examined together- as a woman and a man.
The arguments put forward in support of that plea in law will be examined together with the arguments raised by the applicant in support of its third plea in law.
Verheugen also confirmed that Bulgaria and Romania will continue to be regarded as would-be members, andtheir bids would be examined together rather than separately.
The Court of First Instance also rejected the first andsecond pleas, which it examined together, and subsequently the third and fourth pleas, for the reasons set out respectively in paragraphs 104 to 156, 163 to 172 and 173 to 179 of the judgment under appeal.
Due to the peculiarities of their socio-economic situation and possibilities for their future development, driven by the similarity in the characterof their geographical location, they will be examined together.
Where needed, up to 15 g can be added to a total pool of 100 g and examined together with these samples in accordance with 3(I).
In light of those preliminary points and having regard to the connections between the various questions referred, the first and fifth questions, relating to the interpretation of Article 71 of Regulation No 44/2001,will be examined together first.
When the set of targets and indicators has been assembled,they should be examined together relative to the environmental objectives laid down in Article 1 to assess whether the achievement of the targets would lead the marine environment to a status matching them.
In the light of those preliminary remarks, and in view of the connections between some of the questions put by the referring court, the first and second questions, which relate to the interpretation of Article 34(1) of Regulation No 44/2001,will be examined together and in the first place.
The first, third andfourth pleas should be examined together in so far as all three relate to the assessment of the validity of the Commission's position on the possible existence of indirect aid in favour of the minority shareholders, including the applicants.
Therefore, two distinct types of foreign conduct that, in principle,may have both fallen outside the scope of Article 102 TFEU were suddenly caught by that provision because they were examined together with other conduct as parts of an overall plan to restrict competition.
By its questions,which must be examined together, the national court asks, essentially, to what extent it is necessary to take into account the general interest in not unduly restricting the availability of certain signs in the assessment of the scope of the exclusive rights of the trade mark proprietor.
In the light of those preliminary remarks, and in view of the connections between some of the questions put by the referring court, the first and second questions, which relate to the interpretation of Article 34(1) of Regulation No 44/2001,will be examined together and in the first place.
By its questions, which should be examined together, the referring court asks, in essence, how, in the case where a manufacturer faces a claim of liability for a defective product, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 is to be interpreted for the purpose of identifying the place of the event giving rise to the damage.
By its first andsecond questions, which should be examined together, the national court is essentially asking whether, if all the documents required pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation No 615/98 have been produced by the exporter, it is for the exporter or the competent authority to establish that the conditions laid down in Article 5(3) of that regulation have been fulfilled.
The first and third questions,which should be examined together, relate to whether, and on what conditions, Article 35 of Directive 2004/38 allows a Member State which considers that it is faced with a‘systemic abuse of rights' when residence cards within the meaning of Article 10 of that directive are issued, to adopt a measure such as the measure at issue in the main proceedings.
By its questions, which should be examined together, the referring court asks, in essence, whether EU law precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which authorises the sale of contact lenses only in shops which specialise in the sale of medical devices and which prohibits, consequently, the sale of contact lenses via the Internet.
By its fourth and sixth questions,which can be examined together, the referring court raises, in essence, the issue of how Article 36 TFEU is to be interpreted with respect to the extent of the review of proportionality which that court must carry out when it examines national legislation in the light of the justification relating to the protection of the health and life of humans, under that article.
By its questions, which can be examined together, the referring court seeks, in essence, to ascertain whether Article 2(a) of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, the written answers submitted by a candidate at a professional examination and any examiner's comments with respect to those answers constitute personal data, within the meaning of that provision.