Примери за използване на Multi-donor trust на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Multi-Donor Trust Fund in Indonesia planned to construct up to 10 000 houses and repair a further 15 000.
About 26% of the contributions to UN organisations are through Multi-Donor Trust Funds4.
In the Multi-Donor Trust Fund, much attention was given by the donorsŐ group to achieving visibility focused on results.
One of the main reasons for the CommissionŐs decision to channel its aid through the Multi-Donor Trust Fund was to enhance coordination.
It was not until May 2007 that the Multi-Donor Trust Fund earmarked 50 million euro for economic development and livelihoods.
In Indonesia, visibility in the eyes of beneficiaries anddonors was reduced because funds were channelled through the Multi-Donor Trust Fund.
In Indonesia, the Multi-Donor Trust Fund receives 40% ofitsfundsfrom the Commission and a further 50% from EU Member States.
After the tsunami, the Commission channelled its aid for Indonesia(some 200 million euro) through the World Bank Multi-Donor Trust Fund as shown in Table 2.
In Indonesia, the Multi-Donor Trust Fund receives 40% of its funds from the Commission and a further 50% from EU Member States.
However, the CommissionŐs decision to channel its funding through the Multi-Donor Trust Fund reduced the EUŐs visibility in the eyes of beneficiaries and donors.
In Indonesia, the Multi-Donor Trust Fund financed a 50 million euro project to develop subdistricts(the Kecamatan Development Project).
Furthermore, some EU Member States also use other mechanisms such as the World Bank Palestinian reform and development plan(PRDP) Multi-Donor Trust Fund as well as bilateral funding.
The European Commission was the largest donor to the Multi-Donor Trust Fund, pledging over 200 million euros or 40% of total pledges.
The Multi-Donor Trust Fund only approved projects which had previously been screened by the government agency responsible for coordinating the reconstruction effort.
The implementation of the CommissionŐs rehabilitation response has been most rapid in Indonesia,where many outputs were achieved in the two years following the tsunami through the Multi-Donor Trust Fund.
Nevertheless, the Multi-Donor Trust Fund has addressed with delay the key area of restoration of livelihoods lost in the tsunami.
European Commission: Information Note for the Committee on Budgetary Control of the European Parliament on Multi-Donor Trust Funds supported by the European Community General Budget since 2003(10.2.2009).
In the case of contributions to Multi-Donor Trust Funds objectives can be generic but clear and quantifiable objectives should be set at project level.
In contrast, in Indonesia following the tsunami,the national agency responsible for coordinating the reconstruction effort screened all project proposals of the Multi-Donor Trust Fund and was also co-chair.
Of the different responses, that of the Multi-Donor Trust Fund in Indonesia was the fastest and, despite some delays, many outputs were achieved there in the two years following the tsunami.
Examples are the interventions in Afghanistan and in particular Iraq,where Commission funding has, until recently, almost exclusively been channelled through Multi-Donor Trust Funds;(c) contributions to the general budget of a UN organisation.
The reports of the Multi-Donor Trust Fund in Indonesia do not link project outputs with the corresponding costs and consequently provide no basis for assessing cost-effectiveness or for benchmarking.
In Indonesia, the Commission has recognised the need to enhance the utility of the houses funded by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund by providing the necessary supporting infrastructure, particularly for the supply of drinking water.
The Multi-Donor Trust Fund for the Reconstruction of Aceh and Nias(MDTF) is funded by 15 international and bilateral organisations, with 90% of the funds provided by the EU(the European Commission and Member States).
The Commission has not addressed all key weaknesses in monitoring and supervision of the efficiency of rehabilitation aid,although it did succeed in improving the quality of monitoring information from the Multi-Donor Trust Fund in Indonesia.
The annual published progress reports of the Multi-Donor Trust Fund did not provide a complete and balanced view of the state of implementation of projects, but instead highlighted progress whilst not mentioning backlogs.
A Steering Committee, co-chaired by the Commission, the World Bank and the government agency responsible for coordinating the reconstruction effort5, was responsible for setting the priorities, approving the projects andmonitoring the progress of the Multi-Donor Trust Fund.
Most of the projects funded by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund are managed by the World Bank which did not systematically share with the Steering Committee internal monitoring reports following field visits to projects.
Project for which the impact is unclear International Reconstruction Fund Facility for Iraq Setting specific and quantifiable indicators andbaselines in general contributions to Multi-Donor Trust Funds can be unfeasible and counterproductive, as contributions cannot be earmarked for specific projects.
By the end of 2006 the Multi-Donor Trust Fund in Indonesia had supported the construction or the rehabilitation of 2 100 houses, 1 900 km of village roads, 240 schools, 118 community centres, 40 health centres and 680 clean water works.