Примери за използване на Retention obligation на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The scope of the retention obligation.
The retention obligation must have a legal basis;
In any case, they will be deleted after expiry of the retention obligation.
After expiry of the retention obligation, it is checked whether there is a further need for processing.
The existence of an objective of general interest recognised by the European Union that is capable of justifying a general data retention obligation.
Хората също превеждат
Once the retention obligation expires, a check is made whether further necessity exists for processing.
The date is deleted at the latest 6 years after the last booking orthey are blocked for advertising purposes(in so far as there is retention obligation).
After the retention obligation expires, we will examine whether there is a further need for processing.
The proportionality, within a democratic society, of a general data retention obligation in the light of the fight against serious crime.
Once the retention obligation has expired, it will be checked whether there is a further requirement for processing.
Service providers must also continually and systematically ensure the security of data,having regard to the particular risks associated with the retention obligation.
B- The compatibility of a general data retention obligation with the regime established by Directive 2002/58.
The retention obligation begins at the end of the calendar year in which the offer was made or the contract was fulfilled.
That requirement of strict interpretation precludes the interpretation of that provision as offering the possibility of adopting a general data retention obligation.
After expiry of the retention obligation, we will check if there is still the necessity to process the personal data.
Thirdly, the implementation of these safeguards by those Member States that wish to impose a general data retention obligation would not seem to me to pose any major practical difficulties.
After expiry of the retention obligation, it will be checked whether there is any further necessity for the processing.
Nevertheless, it is important to bear in mind that any substantial limitation of the scope of a general data retention obligation may considerably reduce the utility of such a regime in the fight against serious crime.
A general data retention obligation need not invariably be regarded as, in itself, going beyond the bounds of what is strictly necessary for the purposes of fighting serious crime.
VidaXL does not store your information longer than necessary for the purposes your information is used for,unless the data has to be stored longer due to legal requirements(such as a retention obligation).
D- The compatibility of a general data retention obligation with the requirements laid down in Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 and Articles 7, 8 and 52(1) of the Charter.
In the cours of our customer relationship management we will store the data no longer than needed in order to fulfill the aforementioned purpose oras long as required in case any statutory retention obligation applies.
The retention obligation even concerned persons for whom there was no evidence to suggest that their conduct might have a link, even an indirect or remote one, with serious crime.
Both Article 52(1) of the Charter and Article 15(1)of Directive 2002/58 lay down requirements concerning the legal basis to which Member States must have recourse when imposing a general data retention obligation.
However, a general data retention obligation would not merely‘restrict the scope' of the rights and obligations mentioned in that provision, it would in fact nullify them.
ProSense BV will not retain your data longer than is necessary for the purposes for which it is processed,unless the data must be retained longer in order to comply with statutory obligations(such as a retention obligation).
I infer from the foregoing that a general data retention obligation need not invariably be regarded as, in itself, going beyond the bounds of what is strictly necessary for the purposes of fighting serious crime.
This retention obligation relates to data processed in the context of telephony services, telephony services which use a mobile connection, electronic messaging systems, internet access services and internet access capacity provision services.
In reality, as Messrs Watson, Brice and Lewis, the Belgian, Danish, German and Finnish Governments and the Commission have argued,a general data retention obligation, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, is a measure implementing Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58.
The raison d'être of a data retention obligation is to enable law enforcement authorities to access the data retained, and so the issue of the retention of data cannot be entirely separated from the issue of access to that data.