Примери за използване на Same infringement на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
They are part of a large collection of reservations arising from the same infringement.
Actions for damages that are related to the same infringement of competition law, but that are brought by claimants from other levels in the supply chain;
(b) to other injured parties only where full compensation cannot be obtained from the other undertakings that were involved in the same infringement of competition law.
Seven other Facebook users assigned their claims for allegations of the same infringements to him in response to Mr Schrems' online invitation to do so.
The administrative fines imposed by the Commission shall not be in addition to the penalties imposed by the Member States in accordance with Article 89 for the same infringement.
In doing so the authorities punished the affected beneficiaries more than once for the same infringement and farmers suffered financial consequences that were disproportionate to the aims of the penalty initially imposed on them.
Said companies may be held liable vis-à-vis other damaged parties where full compensation for their damages cannot be obtained from the other businesses involved in the same infringement of competition law.
Penalties imposed on the trader for the same infringement in other Member States in cross-border cases where information about such penalties is available through the mechanism established by Regulation(EU) 2017/2394 of the European Parliament and of the Council(*2);
The SME's and immunity recipients are also liable to other injured parties only where full compensation cannot be obtained from the other undertakings that were involved in the same infringement of competition law.
This could be explained by the fact that fines can legally be doubled if the master committed the same infringement within eighteen months, or if any infringement at all was committed within three years of the previous infringement. .
The different interpretations given by different Member States to certain elements of the sanction system lead to a situation where farmers are not treated equally for the same infringement.
The driver shall keep any evidence provided by a Member State concerning penalties imposed orthe initiation of proceedings until such time as the same infringement of this Regulation can no longer lead to a second proceeding or penalty pursuant to this Regulation.
Member States shall ensure that the final decision of a court of anyMember State establishing the existence or non-existence of any infringement shall be considered as a rebuttable presumption for the purposes of any other actions seeking redress before their national courts in another Member State against the same professional for the same infringement.
The administrative fines imposed by the Commission shall not be in addition to the penalties imposed by the Member States in accordance with Article 89 for the same infringement and shall not exceed EUR 30 000 per non-compliant vehicle, system, component or separate technical unit.
Member States shall ensure that an infringement harming collective interests of consumers established in a final decision of an administrative authority or a court, including a final injunction order referred to in Article 5(2)(b),is deemed as irrefutably establishing the existence of that infringement for the purposes of any other actions seeking redress before their national courts against the same trader for the same infringement.
Non-submitting a petition to CPDP shall not impede the court appeal, however the individual shall not be entitled to approach the court, in casehe/she has suspended proceedings before KPDP for the same infringement or in case the same infringement has been appealed and there is no enforced court judgment.
Although Member States may lay down rules for administrative andcriminal penalties for the same infringements, Member States should not be required to lay down rules for administrative penalties for the infringements of this Regulation which are subject to national criminal law.
The Authority welcomed the new Proposal on class action,which intends to facilitate redress for consumers when many consumers are victims of the same infringement, a so-called“mass harm” situation.
This leads to operators being sanctioned differently even within a Member State for having committed the same infringement. Special Report No 9/2012- Audit of the control system governing the production, processing, distribution and imports of organic products.
Furthermore, the EDPS also welcomes the new Proposal on collective redress,which intends to facilitate redress for consumers where many consumers are victims of the same infringement, in a so-called mass harm situation.
Even though nothing prevents Member States from laying down rules for administrative andcriminal sanctions for the same infringement, Member States should not be required to lay down rules for administrative sanctions for the infringements of this Regulation which are subject to national criminal law.
Member States shall ensure that a final decision of a court of one Member State establishing the existence ornon-existence of the infringement for the purposes of any other actions seeking redress before their national courts in another Member State against the same trader for the same infringement is considered a rebuttable presumption.
Even though nothing prevents Member States from laying down rules for administrative sanctions as well as criminal sanctions for the same infringements, Member States should not be required to lay down rules for administrative sanctions for infringements of this Directive which are subject to national criminal law.
Even though nothing prevents Member States from laying down rules for administrative andcriminal sanctions for the same infringement, Member States should not be required to lay down rules for administrative sanctions for the infringements of this Regulation which are subject to national criminal law.
Even though nothing prevents Member States from laying down rules for administrative sanctions as well as criminal sanctions for the same infringements, Member States should not be required to lay down rules for administrative sanctions for infringements of this Directive which are subject to national criminal law.
Even though nothing prevents Member States from laying down rules for administrative as well as criminal sanctions for the same infringements, they should not be required to lay down rules for administrative sanctions for infringements of this Regulation which are already subject to national criminal law by 3 July 2016.
Although an undertaking that has taken part in an infringement through conduct of its own may also be held responsible for conduct of other undertakings in the context of the same infringement, that applies only to the period of its participation in that infringement(Case C‑49/92 P Commission v Anic Partecipazioni[1999] ECR I‑4125, paragraph 83).
(7)Furthermore, any fines imposed as penalties should take into account the annual turnover and profits of the infringing trader andany fines that have been imposed on the trader in other Member States for the same infringement in, particular, in the context of the widespread infringements of consumer law and widespread infringements with a Union dimension that are subject to coordinated investigation and enforcement in accordance with Regulation(EU) 2017/2394.
(iv) repetition of the same serious infringement during a 6-month period.
(c) criminal investigations or judicial proceedings have already been initiated orfinal judgment has already been given in respect of the same intra-Union infringement and against the same trader before the judicial authorities in the Member State of the requested or applicant authority.