Примери коришћења To measure fair value на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
(c) disclosures required to measure fair value.
However, the fair value hierarchy prioritises the inputs to valuation techniques,not the valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
Valuation techniques used to measure fair value shall be applied consistently.
Paragraphs B13-B30 describe the use of present value techniques to measure fair value.
When using an expected present value technique to measure fair value, either Method 1 or Method 2 could be used.
Related disclosures, this IFRS establishes a fair value hierarchy that categorises into three levels(see paragraphs 76-90)the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
If multiple valuation techniques are used to measure Fair Value, the results(i.e. respective indications of Fair Value) shall be evaluated considering the reasonableness of the range of values indicated by those results.
Assumptions about risk include the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value(such as a pricing model) and the risk.
If multiple valuation techniques are used to measure fair value, the results(respective indications of fair value) shall be evaluated and weighted, as appropriate, considering the reasonableness of the range indicated by those results.
Prescribe the use of a single specific present value technique norlimit the use of present value techniques to measure fair value to the techniques discussed.
The present value technique used to measure fair value will depend on facts and circumstances specific to the asset or liability being measured(eg whether prices for comparable assets or liabilities can be observed in the market) and the availability of sufficient data.
A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value andshall be used without adjustment to measure fair value whenever available, except as specified in paragraph 79.
If the transaction price is fair value at initial recognition anda valuation technique that uses unobservable inputs will be used to measure fair value in subsequent periods, the valuation technique shall be calibrated so that at initial recognition the result of the valuation technique equals the transaction price.
Although an entity must be able to access the market, the entity does not need to be able to sell the particular asset ortransfer the particular liability on the measurement date to be able to measure fair value on the basis of the price in that market.
An entity uses valuation techniques appropriate in the circumstances andfor which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions include assumptions about risk,for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value(such as a pricing model) and/or the risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique.
The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances andfor which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
The highest and best use of a non-financial asset establishes the valuation premise used to measure the fair value of the asset, as follows:(a).
The price in the principal market or most advantageous market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability is not adjusted for transaction costs.
An asset's use in combination with other assets or with other assets andliabilities might be incorporated into the valuation technique used to measure the fair value of the asset.
It might also not be possible to measure the fair value of the total remuneration package independently, without measuring directly the fair value of the equity instruments granted.
That might be the case when using the multiperiod excess earnings method to measure the fair value of an intangible asset because that valuation technique specifically takes into account the contribution of any complementary assets and the associated liabilities in the group in which such an intangible asset would be used.
If the unit of account for the liability is not for the combined package,the objective is to measure the fair value of the issuer's liability, not the fair value of the combined package.
That exception permits an entity to measure the fair value of a group of financial assets and financial liabilities on the basis of the price that would be received to sell a net long position(ie an asset) for a particular risk exposure or paid to transfer a net short position(ie a liability) for a particular risk exposure in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.
In some cases,the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or a liability might be categorised within different levels of the fair value hierarchy.
For transactions with employees and others providing similar services,the entity is required to measure the fair value of the equity instruments granted, because it is typically not possible to estimate reliably the fair value of employee services received.
When using the exception in paragraph 48 to measure the fair value of a group of financial assets and financial liabilities managed on the basis of the entity's net exposure to a particular market risk(or risks), the entity shall apply the price within the bid-ask spread that is most representative of fair value in the circumstances to the entity's net exposure to those market risks(see paragraphs 70 and 71).