英語 での Other nuclear explosive devices の使用例とその 日本語 への翻訳
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Under the TPNW,states-parties may not“test” nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
In this respect, we reiterate our support for a halt to theproduction of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, which is the objective of a fissile material cut-off treaty, and welcome the establishment of the high-level fissile material cut-off treaty expert preparatory group to address challenges in this area.
Under the new treaty,states may not"test" nuclear weapons or any other nuclear explosive devices.
(g) Allow any stationing, installation or deployment of an nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices in its territory or at any place under its jurisdiction or control.
(b) Notwithstanding Article 1(a), declare whether it owns,possesses or controls any nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices;
An international ban on theproduction of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices(cut-off) would further underpin the process towards the total elimination of nuclear weapons.
Moreover, it also prohibits the"Use orthreaten to use nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
The international community should make all the possibleefforts to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and other nuclear explosive devices, without hampering the peaceful uses of nuclear energy by States parties to the Treaty.
Each State Party in a position to do so shall provide assistance for the victims of the use ortesting of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
Under the Treaty, the nuclear-weapon States are obliged not to transfer possession orcontrol to any recipient nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, and not in any way to assist, encourage or induce non-nuclear-weapon States to manufacture, acquire or control over such weapons or devices. .
Under NPT Article II, each non-nuclear-weapon State(NNWS) Party undertakes,among other things“not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.”.
Without prejudice to any other duty or obligation that it may have under international law,a State Party that has used or tested nuclear weapons or any other nuclear explosive devices shall have a responsibility to provide adequate assistance to affected States Parties, for the purpose of victim assistance and environmental remediation.
The Conference remains convinced that universal adherence to the Treaty and full compliance of all Parties with its provisions are the bestway to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and other nuclear explosive devices.
The cost related to the implementation of verification measures required under Article 4 as well as thecosts related to the destruction of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, and the elimination of nuclear-weapon programmes, including the elimination or conversion of all nuclear-weapons-related facilities, should be borne by the States Parties to which they apply.
We are encouraged by the growing international recognition of the need to complete without delay universal, comprehensive and verifiable treaties to ban nuclear weapons tests andto cut off the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons and other nuclear explosive devices.
The cost related to the implementation of verification measures required under Article 4 as well as thecosts related to the destruction of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, and the elimination of nuclear-weapon programmes, including the elimination or conversion of all nuclear-weapons-related facilities, should be borne by the States Parties to which they apply.
Emphasizing that, for the total elimination of nuclear weapons to beachieved, effective international cooperation to prevent the proliferationof nuclear weapons is vital and must be enhanced through, inter alia,theextension of international controls over all fissile material for nuclearweapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
We strongly support the early commencement of negotiations on a Treaty banning theproduction of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices that includes provisions for international verification.
Within the framework of the NSG's mandate, the Group expressed its concerns regarding continued global proliferation activities and reaffirmed its determination to continue to cooperate closely in order to deter, hinder and prevent the transfer of controlled items ortechnology that could contribute to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
We believe the next logical step to advance the multilateral nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation agenda is the negotiation of a treaty banning the production offissile material for use in nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices(FMCT) on the basis of document CD/1299 and the mandate contained therein.
Emphasizing that, for the total elimination of nuclear weapons to beachieved, effective international cooperation to prevent the proliferationof nuclear weapons is vital and must be enhanced through, inter alia,theextension of international controls over all fissile material for nuclearweapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
Emphasizing that, for the total elimination of nuclear weapons to beachieved, effective international cooperation to prevent the proliferationof nuclear weapons is vital and must be enhanced through, inter alia,theextension of international controls over all fissile material for nuclearweapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
New supply arrangements for the transfer of source or special fissionable material or equipment or material especially designed or prepared for the processing, use or production of special fissionable material to non-nuclear-weapon States should require, as a necessary precondition, acceptance of the Agency s full-scope safeguards andinternationally legally binding commitments not to acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.