Eksempler på brug af Authorised gmos på Engelsk og deres oversættelser til Dansk
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Authorised GMOs are safe, and ideology does not fill bellies!
Amendments, in particular Amendment No 19, reducing the threshold for labelling authorised GMOs from 0.9% to 0.5%;
However, the thresholds apply only to adventitious traces of authorised GMOs that have undergone extensive environmental and health-risk assessment.
Countries outside the EU now have an increasing influence over authorisation practices within the EU, with the result being an ongoing decline in the health and environmental safety levels of authorised GMOs.
Annual reports of the environmental monitoring conducted for all authorised GMOs have not identified any adverse effects to the environment.
In March 2015, the Council and the Parliament agreed on an amendment of the GMO legal framework to allow Member States to restrict orprohibit the cultivation of authorised GMOs Directive 2015/412/EU.
With regard to the presence of authorised GMOs, we are in favour of the most demanding thresholds, given that the rate used must be realistic, that is to say based upon measurable, technical criteria.
Measures adopted under this Article shall not affect the free circulation of authorised GMOs as, or in, products.
For products where adventitious ortechnically unavoidable traces of authorised GMOs cannot be excluded, a minimum threshold may be established below which these products shall not have to be labelled according to the provision in paragraph 1.
Article 21(2) of Directive 18/2001/EC provides for the possibility of establishing thresholds below which traces of authorised GMOs are exempted from labelling requirements.
For products intended for direct processing,paragraph 1 shall not apply to traces of authorised GMOs in a proportion no higher than 0,9% or lower thresholds established under the provisions of Article 30(2), provided that these traces are adventitious or technically unavoidable.
Once adopted, today's proposal will, fully in line withthe principle of subsidiarity, grant Member States a greater say as regards the use of EU- authorised GMOs in food and feed on their respective territories.
Amendments putting an end to the tolerance of non-authorised GMOs in the food chain when their percentage is lower than 0.5%, in particular Amendment No 43;(incidentally, the question arises as to how the Council can, in this case, propose a threshold of 0.5%,when it maintains that such a threshold is technically impossible where the labelling of authorised GMOs is concerned);
On the second part of your question on the coexistence issue, I would like to add the following.It should be noted that authorised GMOs can be freely traded and used within the EU under the conditions of the authorisation consent provided.
These zones can be established only under the voluntary and unanimous agreement of all farmers concerned in the respective locations,while allowing for the possibility for any farmer to withdraw and cultivate authorised GMOs if he or she so wishes.
Finally, EFSA is monitoring all new scientific publications which could have an impact on the safety of the authorised GMOs and until now, none of them have changed the conclusions of the adopted EFSA opinions.
Written consents or decisions of authorisation issued or adopted with a geographical scope limited to certain areas or measures adopted by Member States, in accordance with this Directive, which restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs, should not prevent orrestrict the use of authorised GMOs by other Member States.
It is a great success, particularly for our group, that all of the other groups are nowsupporting the Council's common position on the limit values: 0.9% for authorised GMOs and 0.5% for GMOs that are ready for authorisation and in a backlog because of the moratorium.
While coexistence measures have been addressed by the Commission Recommendation of 13 July 2010, there should also be the possibility for Member States to adopt measures restricting orprohibiting cultivation of authorised GMOs in all or part of their territory under this Directive.
In this re gard, certain amendments are designed to main tain the provisions of Directive 2001/18/EC so that a threshold is not set, below which the adventitious presence of GMOs not authorised in the Union docs not have to be shown on the labelling;a further amendment sets at 0.5% the threshold beyond which the adventitious presence of authorised GMOs must be indicated, with provision be ing made for this threshold to be lowered when ad vances in science and technology allow.
The report gives responsibility for authorising GMOs to the European Food Authority.
Authorising GMOs will result in disputes amongst farmers.
The GMO legislation lays down specific procedures for assessing and authorising GMOs that are time-limited and transparent.
The Union is demonstrating its own kind of legal schizophrenia by authorising GMOs on the market whilst banning the use of GMOs in agriculture and cattle raising in organic farming.
Important improvements have already been made in reducing the procedure orthe time line- the time necessary- for authorising GMOs.
I stated then that it is not only an issue of whether we like or authorise GMOs or not or whether we label them or not.
Another defect in this resolution is the fact that in paragraph 36 it congratulates itself on the subject of the agreement drawn up a month ago between Parliament and the Council,on the procedure for authorising GMOs.
Finally, as if this were not enough,the resolution calls for the European Food Safety Authority to be responsible for authorising GMOs, which we totally disagree with, because we would like each State to retain the right of international safeguard in this important field.
The Council of Ministersis also at fault, however. The national ministers responsible lack the courage to agree to authorise GMOs that have been examined and found to be safe.
As of today, 58 GMOs are authorised in the EU for food and feed uses covering maize, cotton, soybean, oilseed rape, sugar beet.