Exemplos de uso de Misuse of powers em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Financial
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
The sixth plea alleges infringement of the principle of proportionality and misuse of powers.
Officials Vacancy notice Obvious error Misuse of powers Statement of reasons Admissibility.
In the case in question, the suspension of the measures, classified as new aid measures,did not entail a misuse of powers.
Recruitment procedure Statement of reasons Misuse of powers Transfer from the Language Service to Category A Articles 7, 25, 27, 29 and 45 of the Staff Regulations.
In some casesan extensive argumentation and analysis may be required to prove that the misuse of powers has in fact occurred.”.
Misuse of powers presupposes, ex hypothesi, that the institution responsible was competent to adopt a measure but used that competence for the purpose of attaining ends other than those stated.
In view of that finding, it is not necessary to rule on the issues of action ultra vires and/or misuse of powers, raised in the context of the first plea in law.
Lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the Treaty orof any rule of law relating to its application, and misuse of powers.
The sixth plea in law,alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality and a misuse of powers, and the seventh plea in law, alleging infringement of Regulation No 448/2004, the principles of equal treatment and legal certainty, and the contradictory nature of the contested letters.
Countervailing charge Products in transit to the Community- Legitimate expectations- Principle of proportionality- Equal treatment- Misuse of powers.
The applicant raises three pleas in law alleging, first, an infringement of Article 82 EC; second, that the operative part of the contested decision is defective; and third, misuse of powers and infringement of the principles of proportionality, legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations.
The mere assertion that the ECB acted with the aim of‘suppressing a democratic right' amounts to pure intellectual speculation,not to concrete and objective evidence of a misuse of powers.
The question is not, in point of fact, whether the contested measures are appropriate(that issue is the subjectmatter of the pleas based on misuse of powers and manifest error of assessment) but whether, even supposing that they are, their introduction has not caused a breach of the principle of protection of legitimate expectations.
He considers that his review of such cases should be limited to checking whether the rules governing the procedure are complied with, the facts are correct, andthat there is no manifest error of assessment or misuse of powers.
Actions for annulment- Natural or legal persons- Measures of direct andindividual concern to them- Misuse of powers- Seriousness of the failure of the institution concerned to fulfil obligations- No effective judicial protection against that failure- Interpretation, contrary to law, of the requirement of being individually concerned- InadmissibilityArt. 230, fourth para..
SIDE v COMMISSION duty to give reasons have been complied with and to verifying the accuracy of the facts relied on and that there has been no error of law,manifest error in the assessment of the facts or misuse of powers.
In support of the forms of order sought by it, the applicant puts forward four pleas in law: it alleges manifest errors of fact,infringement of essential procedural requirements, misuse of powers and breach of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.
Appeal against the judgment delivered on 14 February 1990 by the Court of First Instance(Third Chamber) in Case T-38/89 with regard to decisions of the Committee to annul vacancy notice COM/902/84 andto adopt vacancy notice COM/83/87- misuse of powers.
The Court of Justice retains its role as a'Conseil d'État' as regards the Commission's administrative acts, which may be challenged by those to whom they are addressed(in cluding individuals)on the grounds of lack of competence, misuse of powers or infringe ment of any rule of law.
The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to review the legality of framework decisions and decisions in actions brought by a Member State or the Commission on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of this Treaty orof any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers.
The ECJhas jurisdictionin such actions“on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essentialprocedural requirement, infringement of[the]Treaty or of any rule of lawrelatingto its application, or misuse of powers” second paragraph of Article 230of the Treaty.
Lastly, it must be recalled that, since the Commission enjoys a wide measure of discretion, particularly as to the nature and extent of the measures which it adopts,the Community judicature must, when reviewing such measures, restrict itself to examining whether the exercise of such discretion is vitiated by a manifest error or a misuse of powers or whether the.
The ECJ has jurisdiction in such actions« on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of[ the] Treaty orof any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers» second paragraph of Article 230 of the Treaty.
It shall for this purpose have jurisdiction in actions brought by a Member State, the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement,infringement of the Treaties or of any rule of law relating to their application, or misuse of powers.
Officials- Staff report- Principles of good administration andof legal certainty- Failure to give reasons- General provisions for implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations- Guide to the drafting of staff reports- Manifest errors of assessment- Misuse of powers- Action for annulment Fifth Chamber.
Finally, even if the national regulatory authority for telecommunications had infringed a Community rule and even if the Commission could have initiated proceedings against that Member State for failure to fulfil obligations, such possibilities cannot affect the lawfulness of the Commission's decision,which is not vitiated by any misuse of powers.
It shall for this purpose have jurisdiction in actions brought by a Member State, the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement,infringement of this Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers.
The Court shall have jurisdiction in actions brought by a Member State or by the Council to have decisions or recommendations of the High Authority declared void on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement,infringement of this Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers.
It shall for this purpose have jurisdiction in actions brought by a Member State, the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers or the Commission on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement,infringement of the Constitution or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers.
The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in actions brought by a Member State or by the Council to have decisions or recommendations of the Com mission declared void on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement,infringement of this Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers.