Examples of using A substantive final document in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Political
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The 2005 NPT Review Conference concluded without a substantive final document.
We take note of the fact that it adopted a substantive final document(NPT/CONF.2010/50(Vol. I)), which we hope will be translated into concrete actions in the near future.
My delegation is deeply concerned about the failure of the 2005 Review Conference of theTreaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons to conclude a substantive final document.
The NPT ReviewConference in 2005 was unable to agree on a substantive final document to address the most pressing challenges to the Treaty.
This is clear from the text of our draft resolution, which welcomes in its entirety the adoption by theNPT Review Conference in May 2010 of a substantive Final Document NPT/CONF.2010/50 Vol.
The NPT ReviewConference in 2005 was unable to agree on a substantive final document to address the most pressing challenges to the Treaty.
Regrettably, owing to a lack of the necessary political will from several quarters, it was impossible to discuss appropriately such issues andmuch less to agree on a substantive final document.
We therefore regret that the 2005 NPTReview Conference was unable to agree on a substantive final document to address the most pressing challenges to the Treaty.
The Rio Group welcomes the holding of the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, held in New York in May 2010,and takes note of the fact that it adopted a substantive Final Document NPT/CONF.2010/50 Vol.
We regret that this year 's NPT Review Conference was unable to agree on a substantive final document to address the most pressing challenges to the Treaty.
First, my delegation would like to take up certain aspects that we consider essential with a view to the resumption of the NPT review cycle next May. In this respect we must remember that the preceding cycle which ended in New York in 2005 ended on a disappointing note,as the States parties went away without arriving at consensus on a substantive final document.
The EU regrets that the Review Conference of theNPT in 2005 was unable to agree on a substantive final document to address the most pressing challenges to the Treaty.
Although it was regrettable that the 2005Review Conference had failed to produce a substantive final document, the exchanges between States parties had reflected the importance that they attached to the Treaty, as well as their political determination to maintain and strengthen the non-proliferation regime.
The EU also regrets that last year ' s Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation ofNuclear Weapons was unable to agree on a substantive final document to address the most pressing challenges to the Treaty.
Five years later, at the 2000 Review Conference,agreement was reached on a substantive Final Document, but by that time it had already taken considerable effort to paper over the cracks that were appearing.
It is important to underscore that the Fourth Biennial Meeting managed to adopt,for the first time in the nine years of the existence of the Programme of Action, a substantive final document(A/CONF.192/BMS/2010/3) with the agreement of all States.
Furthermore, I would argue that although the RevCon did not conclude with a substantive final document, there was nevertheless much detailed and useful discussion of ways in which the NPT could be strengthened.
For that reason, our country wishes to underscore the progress made in the recent Review Conference of Parties to the Treatyon the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons(NPT), which adopted a substantive Final Document(NPT/CONF.2010/50(Vol. I)) and identified 64 steps for progress in implementing the provisions of the NPT.
Although the inability of the 2005 Review Conference to reach agreement on a substantive final document was regrettable, the international community should do its best to uphold the authority of the Treaty, which was vital for global peace and security, placing special emphasis on universal adherence.
In that regard, we wish to underscore the achievements of the eighth Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the NonProliferation of Nuclear Weapons(NPT), which, after 10 years with no concrete results,made it possible to approve a substantive final document and to identify 64 measures for making progress towards implementing the Treaty ' s provisions.
Welcomes the adoption by the 2010 Review Conference of theParties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of a substantive final document containing conclusions and recommendations for follow-on actions relating to nuclear disarmament, nuclear non-proliferation, peaceful uses of nuclear energy and the Middle East, particularly implementation of the 1995 resolution on the Middle East;
Germany regrets that the Review Conference of theNPT in 2005 was unable to agree on a substantive final document to address the most pressing challenges to the Treaty.
Welcomes the adoption by the 2010 Review Conference of theParties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of a substantive final document containing conclusions and recommendations for follow-on actions relating to nuclear disarmament, including concrete steps for the total elimination of nuclear weapons, nuclear non-proliferation, peaceful uses of nuclear energy and the Middle East, particularly implementation of the 1995 resolution on the Middle East;
Welcoming the adoption by the 2010 Review Conference of theParties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of a substantive Final Document containing conclusions and recommendations for follow-on actions relating to nuclear disarmament.
We regret that last year 's NPT Review Conference was unable to agree on a substantive final document to address the most pressing challenges to the Treaty. We see that as a missed opportunity.
The Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons(NPT)failed to adopt a substantive final document that would reflect our determination to control the use and proliferation of nuclear weapons and contain an unequivocal commitment to eliminating them.
The majority of speakers, however, expressed disappointment at both the failure of the2005 NPT Review Conference to agree on a substantive final document, and the omission of a section on disarmament and non-proliferation from the Summit Outcome document. .
Mr. Woolcott(Australia) welcomed the adoption by the 2010 Review Conference of a substantive final outcome document, which contained a wide-ranging and forward-looking plan of action across the three pillars of the Non-Proliferation Treaty that built upon the results of the 1995 and 2000 Review Conferences.
That is clear from the text of our draft resolution,which welcomes the adoption by the NPT Review Conference in May of the substantive Final Document(NPT/CONF.2010/50(Vol. I)) in its entirety.