Examples of using Comments dated in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
In comments dated 18 June 2007, counsel rejects the version of events of the State party.
In their comments dated 23 February 2009, the authors challenge the State party ' s submission.
In comments dated 25 October 1999 the author rebuts the State party ' s arguments.
In her comments dated 2 May 2007, the author responds to some aspects of the State party ' s submissions.
In his comments dated 22 November 2010, the complainant ' s counsel recalled relevant facts of the case.
In their comments dated 21 October 2008, the authors maintain that the communication should be deemed admissible.
In his comments dated 25 November 2008, the author reiterates the arguments expounded in the initial communication.
In comments dated 3 December 2009, the author refers to the State party ' s description of him as being a fugitive from justice.
In their comments dated 18 February 2008, the authors maintain that Act No. 87/1991 is discriminatory, and in violation of the Covenant.
In comments dated 28 April 1996, the author rebuts the State party ' s arguments and dismisses them as irrelevant to the solution of his case.
In comments dated 26 June 2008, the author reiterates that, pursuant to an amnesty issued in 1948, the sentence against her mother was quashed.
In comments dated 8 September 2008, the author argued that the State party was merely recapitulating the domestic judicial procedure.
In their comments dated 31 January 2003, the petitioners challenge the State party ' s conclusions concerning the non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.
In comments dated 10 December 2007, the author submits that the observations of the State party do not refute but prove the absence of any crime on her father ' s part.
The source, in comments dated 18 March 2013, maintains that the Government ' s reply in no way invalidates the allegations regarding the arbitrary nature of Mr. Bettar ' s detention.
In comments dated 28 July 2003, counsel submits that the complainant was not aware that he had been acquitted in the case of murder until he received the State party ' s submission.
In comments dated 19 September 1993, counsel notes that the Ministry of Defence is neither competent nor in a position to draw conclusions from investigations which should be undertaken by the judiciary.
In comments dated 8 July 2011, the source maintains that the Government does not refute the allegation that Mr. Hamid Ali has not been brought before a judge or been charged with any offence, which, in the source ' s opinion, confirms the arbitrary nature of his detention.
In comments dated 13 May 2008, the State party begins by reaffirming its observations on admissibility and the merits and reiterates its request that the Committee should primarily declare the communication inadmissible and, secondarily, reject it on the merits.
In comments dated 18 September 2007, the complainant rejects the State party ' s argument that the documents he has produced have" all the characteristics of forgeries" in that they are either entirely handwritten or filled in by hand and contain expressions that would be out of place in police documents, as well as spelling mistakes.
In comments dated 22 September 2000, counsel addresses the State party ' s argument that Ms. Ignatane did not challenge the conclusions of the State Language Board that she did not have the highest level of proficiency in Latvian, but challenged the legality of the Election Commission ' s decision to strike her off the list of candidates.
In comments dated 13 April 2006, the author points out that although the presiding trial judge read out the conclusions of an expert according to which the grenade thrown into the car was not a military one and no attempts for its modification were made, this was not taken into account in the determination of her son ' s punishment.
In his comments, dated 10 June 1993, on the State party ' s submission, counsel addresses the refusal of the Minister to seek assurances on the non-imposition of the death penalty, and refers to the book La Forest ' s Extradition to and from Canada, in which it is stated that Canada in fact routinely seeks such an undertaking.
In comments dated 19 November 2009, pursuant to the Committee ' s decision, taken at its forty-second session, to ask the State party to provide details of the material verification of the authenticity of the documents produced by the complainant, the State party first recalls that the documents produced by the complainant on 3 October 2008 were produced after his application was submitted to the Committee.
In comments dated 2 July 2002, the author submits that she was not informed about the nature of the investigation against her in relation to causing light bodily injury, and was not presented with the final charge and evidence against her until the end of the investigation; by contrast, Ms. Zakarian was recognized as a victim much earlier and given access to the criminal file, in particular the medical evidence.
In comments dated 20 November 2008, the State party supplemented its observations with the information that, under article R. 723-3 of the Code governing the Entry and Stay of Aliens and the Right to Asylum, any alien whose asylum application has been definitively rejected once by OFPRA and the Refugee Appeals Board is entitled to submit new evidence to OFPRA in order to have the application reviewed.
In comments dated 31 March 2003 the complainant reiterates that he would be at a personal and present risk of torture in India, as confirmed by the Federal Court decisions stating that he" would suffer irreparable harm"(staying order of 2 October 1998) or" endure unusual, undeserved or disproportionate hardship"(judgement of 24 November 1999), if returned to that country.
In comments dated 25 June 2010, the author notes that, during the criminal hearing before the Thonon-les-Bains Criminal Court on 3 April 2002, he argued that the authorities had committed a procedural abuse by obtaining authorization for a search of the premises pursuant to article L16 B of the Book of Tax Procedures, an article which does not apply to indirect taxation or to the offences that were actually prosecuted.
From the eye icon,you can choose whether to display or hide the Sharing, comments, date, Tags, or Rss Feeds.
Name Image Comments Dates Iry-Hor Correct chronological position unclear.[12] Around 3150 BC Crocodile Potentially read Shendjw; identity and existence are disputed.[13] Around 3150 BC Ka Maybe read Sekhen rather than Ka. Correct chronological position unclear.[14] Around 3150 BC Scorpion II Potentially read Serqet; possibly the same person as Narmer.[15] Around 3150 BC.