Examples of using Decolonization programme in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Decolonization programme in the United Nations.
He noted the Secretary-General's decision to maintain the decolonization programme in the Department of Political Affairs.
Decolonization Programme of the United Nations system(A/C.4/52/L.4/Rev.1).
Mrs. Emerson(Portugal)welcomed the Secretary-General's assurances of the high priority which he attached to the decolonization programme.
Accordingly, the Decolonization Programme should be given all the necessary human and budgetary resources.
After careful consideration of the matter the Special Committeehad adopted by consensus a resolution entitled" Decolonization Programme in the United Nations system"(A/AC.109/2094).
Noting the resolution entitled ' Decolonization programme in the United Nations system ' adopted by consensus by the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples on 6 June 1997,A/AC.109/2094.
Mr. Ovia(Papua New Guinea), supported by Ms. Silot Bravo(Cuba) and Ms. Montaño(Bolivia),said that the decolonization programme had been one of the major success stories of the United Nations.
Those delegations felt that the transfer of the Decolonization Unit from the Department of Political Affairs to the Department of General Assembly Affairs and ConferenceServices denied the political essence of the Special Committee and undermined the Organization ' s decolonization programme.
At the 1470th meeting, on 6 June,the Chairman drew attention to a draft resolution entitled" Decolonization programme in the United Nations system"(A/AC.109/L.1862) submitted by Papua New Guinea.
The sponsors of this draft resolution are concerned about the attempts to prevent the implementation of a decision of the Secretary-General contained in document A/52/531,thereby diminishing the decolonization programme in the United Nations system.
The sponsors of the draftresolution felt it was essential to state that the decolonization programme should remain in the Department of Political Affairs in view of the political nature of decolonization measures.
Mr. GAMITO(Portugal), after thanking the two Under-Secretaries-General for their explanations,said that there was room for greater certainty that the decolonization programme would not be politically undermined or underfunded.
They welcomed the Secretary-General's decision, at the end of 1997, to maintain a decolonization programme in the Department of Political Affairs and to provide the Decolonization Unit with the resources needed to fulfil its mandate until the end of the International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism.
Mr. OVIA(Papua New Guinea), speaking on behalf of the Chairman of the Special Committee and the 18 sponsors,introduced a draft resolution on agenda item 18 entitled" Decolonization programme in the United Nations system".
He was concerned tonote the proposal regarding the redeployment of two posts from the decolonization programme(A/52/6/Rev. 1, para. 2.101), since decolonization was one of the core concerns of the United Nations.
Mr. Ayoub(Iraq) said that his delegation, as a founding member of the Special Committee on Decolonization, fully supported the Special Committee's work andwelcomed the Secretary-General's decision to keep the Decolonization Programme in the Department of Political Affairs.
All the speakers reaffirmed that the decolonization programme must remain in the Department of Political Affairs and noted, in particular, that the Secretary-General's attention should be drawn to the decisions and positions of the sponsors of the draft resolution to the effect that they insisted that the programme should remain in the Department of Political Affairs.
(c) That the Department of General Assembly Affairs and Conference Services of the Secretariat will beresponsible for the technical secretariat servicing relating to the decolonization programme, as outlined in his letter of 17 March 1997;See A/51/829, sect.
In order to ensure full andtimely implementation of your decision regarding the Decolonization Programme in the United Nations system, conveyed to me in your letter of 27 October 1997(A/52/531), I have addressed today a letter to the Chairman of the Fifth Committee and to the Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions, a copy of which I attach herewith.
I would like to invite you to open the 1998 session of the Special Committee, which will begin in the first week of February. I wish to convey to you the assurances of the Special Committee that it will continue to cooperate fully with you and with the Secretariat in order toimplement the Decolonization Programme.
He also affirmed his delegation ' s agreement with the position of the Special Committee,which in its resolution entitled" Decolonization programme in the United Nations system" of 6 June 1997(A/AC.109/2094) reaffirmed the political nature of its mandate and urged that the Decolonization Branch of the Secretariat should be strengthened and retained in the Department of Political Affairs.
Mr. Maddens(Belgium) asked whether the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions was prepared to comment on the results of its consultations concerning the Secretary-General's proposed revisions to the reform package he had submitted,particularly those concerning the decolonization programme.
As you and the members of your Committee are aware, 37 Member States, including my own,submitted a draft resolution entitled" Decolonization programme in the United Nations system"(A/AC.109/2094) to the Fourth Committee urging the Secretary-General to maintain the Decolonization Unit with all its present functions, as stipulated in the medium-term plan for the period 1998-2001(A/51/6/Rev.1 and Corr.1), in the Department of Political Affairs.
The proposed administrative reform of the United Nations Secretariat envisaging the transfer of the Decolonization Unit, with all its functions pertaining to the Special Committee on Decolonization and the Fourth Committee,will damage the decolonization programme and diminish its political nature and significance.
At the regular session of the Special Committee, 12 members of the Special Committee, together with Portugal in its capacity as an administering Power,had sponsored a resolution entitled" Decolonization programme in the United Nations system", in which the Secretary-General was urged to maintain the Decolonization Branch, with all its current functions, in the Department of Political Affairs. That resolution had been adopted by consensus and was included in the report as a recommendation of the Special Committee to the General Assembly.
Many delegations recalled General Assembly resolution 43/47 of 22 November 1988 entitled" International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism" and all other relevant Assembly resolutions and decisions on the matter,and noted the resolution of the Special Committee, entitled" Decolonization programme in the United Nations system", adopted by consensus on 6 June 1997(A/AC.109/2094).
In response to the views expressed by a number of delegations at several meetings, the Secretary-General in a letter of 24 October 1997 to the Chairman of the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples(A/52/521)informed him of his decision to maintain the substantive responsibilities for the decolonization programme in the Department of Political Affairs.
Both the Special Political and Decolonization Committee( Fourth Committee) and the Special Committee on the Situation with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries andPeoples had been concerned about the administrative decision to transfer the Organization 's Decolonization Programme from the Department of Political Affairs to the Department of General Assembly Affairs and Conference Services, since they believed it would have jeopardized the political nature of that Programme. .