Examples of using Explosive testing in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Firstly, we can ban further explosive testing of nuclear weapons.
Since then,the United States has maintained a voluntary moratorium on nuclear explosive testing.
Because of the U.S. moratorium on nuclear explosive testing, any new design would rely on previously tested concepts.
In addition,the United States maintains its current moratorium on nuclear explosive testing.
Since then,the United States has maintained a voluntary moratorium on the explosive testing of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
India remains committedto maintaining a unilateral and voluntary moratorium on nuclear explosive testing.
New Zealand believes a continued moratorium on all nuclear explosive testing is imperative pending formal entry of the comprehensive test ban into force.
In the meantime,the United States will continue to adhere to its moratorium on nuclear explosive testing.
In short,the CTB can either bring an end to nuclear explosive testing, or it can be twisted into a misshapen and ineffectual pry-bar for other goals.
India remains committedto maintaining a unilateral and voluntary moratorium on nuclear explosive testing.
And the United Statesdemonstrated its commitment to ending for all time nuclear explosive testing by being the first to sign the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty(CTBT).
In truth it is andwill remain possible to make simple nuclear weapons without nuclear explosive testing.
We should also put in place a ban on further explosive testing of nuclear weapons, and we encourage all States that have not yet done so to join and ratify the CTBT.
First, the United Kingdom believes that wemust put in place a ban on further explosive testing of nuclear weapons.
The United States has maintained a voluntary moratorium on nuclear explosive testing, has no intention of resuming testing, and calls upon all states to refrain from nuclear explosive testing.
The United States, of course,has maintained a voluntary moratorium on nuclear explosive testing since 1992.
The 2010 Nuclear Posture Review reiterated that the UnitedStates no longer requires nuclear explosive testing to ensure the safety and effectiveness of its remaining nuclear weapons, relying instead on its long-standing stockpile stewardship programme.
The United States remains committed to this moratorium andcalls upon all States to refrain from nuclear explosive testing.
The 2010 Nuclear Posture Review reiterated that the UnitedStates no longer requires nuclear explosive testing to ensure the safety and effectiveness of our remaining nuclear weapons, relying instead on our long-standing Stockpile Stewardship Programme.
The United States remains committed to this moratorium,and calls upon all States to refrain from nuclear explosive testing.
The National Nuclear Security Administration(NNSA) is a United States federal agency responsible for safeguarding national security through the military application of nuclear science. NNSA maintains and enhances the safety, security,and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile without nuclear explosive testing; works to reduce the global danger from weapons of mass destruction; provides the United States Navy with safe and effective nuclear propulsion; and responds to nuclear and radiological emergencies in the United States and abroad.
Among the arms control measures now under discussion is anagreement on a complete ban on any kind of nuclear explosive testing.
As a result, the text submitted to the General Assembly paradoxically does not ban all nuclear testing, but is restricted to explosive testing only. We therefore have before us yet another partial nuclear-test-ban treaty.
We note however that with 165 signatories and 93 ratifications the Treaty has firmlyestablished itself as a powerful international norm against nuclear explosive testing.
We want to see continued progress on ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty(CTBT)and a permanent ban on further explosive testing of nuclear weapons.
His Government had no plans to seek ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty(CTBT)but would continue to observe the moratorium on nuclear explosive testing.
This confidence flows from our conviction that the CTBT will in fact serve the basic security objectives of all States; that it will in fact be the next milestone on the path toward nuclear disarmament; that it will be an important stabilizing factor in all regions of the world; that it in fact satisfies the aspirations Member States of the United Nations voiced so strongly over thepast four decades to put a stop to all nuclear explosive testing.
High voltage firing equipment and instrumentation for explosives testing over long distances and possibly underground.
High voltage firing equipment and instrumentation for explosives testing over long distances and possibly underground: conducting tests to confirm that high voltage firing equipment is suitable for the reliable firing of EBW detonators over long distances.
Since its inception, the Preparatory Commission has concentrated on establishing the global verification regime mandated under article IV of the Treaty toverify compliance with the global prohibition on nuclear explosives testing set out under Article I. The regime will consist of an International Monitoring System, a consultation and clarification process, on-site inspections and confidence-building measures.