Examples of using Initial transparency in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Each of these has provided an initial transparency report as required.
Providing initial transparency reports under Article 7 within the timeframe stated by the Convention;
Furthermore, some 19 States Parties are late in submitting their initial transparency report.
Since the 6MSP, initial transparency reports were submitted by Latvia and Vanuatu.
Notwithstanding, since the entry into force,a number of States Parties have yet to submit their initial transparency report and the annual reporting rate has declined.
Indonesia and Kuwait submitted initial transparency reports confirming or indicating that they possess stockpiled anti-personnel mines they must destroy.
The States Partiesdecided in Vientiane to fulfill their obligations in submitting their initial transparency reports and their annual updates(Action 58 and 59 of the VAP).
Iraq submitted an initial transparency report to confirm no stockpiled anti-personnel mines owned or possessed by it or under its jurisdiction or control.
In general, the report does not distinguish between the information provided in statements given during the intersessional meeting in June 2011 andthat provided in the initial transparency reports.
States Parties have not yet submitted their initial transparency reports, including ten that have not yet reached their deadlines.
In its initial transparency report submitted on 12 September 2002, Niger reported areas under its jurisdiction or control suspected to contain anti-personnel mines.
Twenty-eight States Parties have not yet submitted their initial transparency reports and of these, nine States Parties ' submissions are not yet due.
One State Party, Ethiopia, for which it is assumed possesses, and hence must destroy, stockpiled anti-personnel mines,remains overdue in providing an initial transparency report as required.
Nine States parties had not submitted their initial transparency reports by their deadlines, and the reports have yet to be submitted.
In addition, of the 5 States Parties for which the Convention entered into force sincethe Cartagena Summit, 4 provided an initial transparency report: Finland, Poland, Somalia and South Sudan.
While 26 States parties had submitted initial transparency reports by the deadline, 9 have not yet submitted their transparency reports.
Since the Cartagena Summit, 5 additional States ratified or acceded to the Convention- Finland, Poland, Somalia and South Sudan and Tuvalu-all but for Tuvalu submitted an initial transparency report as required.
One State Party- Equatorial Guinea-has not yet provided initial transparency information, as required, on matters that concern stockpiles and their destruction.
Of these, two(2) States Parties which are presumed not to hold stocks- Equatorial Guinea and Tuvalu-have not yet officially confirmed this by submitting initial transparency information as required in accordance with Article 7.
Palau submitted an initial transparency report to confirm no stockpiled anti-personnel mines owned or possessed by it or under its jurisdiction or control.
Since that time, Estonia, Gambia, Guyana, Papua New Guinea and Saint Lucia and Sao Tome andPrincipe each provided an initial transparency report as required confirming that no stocks were held.
In 2012 South Sudan reported, in its initial transparency report, that 707 suspected hazardous areas totalling 159,367,011 square metres remained to be addressed.
In addition, five States Parties- Equatorial Guinea, Gambia, Haiti, Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe- for which it is assumed do not possess stockpiled anti-personnel mines,are overdue in providing an initial transparency report.
Action 57 Fulfil their obligation to provide initial transparency reports under Article 7, and where relevant, include information in accordance with Article 3.8, without delay.
In addition, Iraq submitted an initial transparency report confirming areas under its jurisdiction or control which are dangerous due to the presence or suspected presence of anti-personnel mines.
Since that time, Vanuatu clarified that thisobligation indeed is not relevant for it and Bhutan submitted its initial transparency report indicating that there are anti-personnel mines in mined areas under Bhutan ' s jurisdiction or control.
Since the 8MSP, initial transparency reports in accordance with Article 7, paragraph 1 have been submitted by[six] States Parties:[Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iraq, Kuwait, Palau and Sao and Principe].
Croatia ratified the Convention on 28 May 1998 and submitted its initial transparency report on 3 September 1999, providing information on areas that contain or are suspected to contain anti-personnel mines.
Submission of an initial transparency report followed by annual reports are legal obligations and a requirement under Article 7 but also an important means of transparency and a confidence building measure among States Parties to the Convention.