Examples of using Multilateral liberalization in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Multilateral liberalization since Marrakesh.
The issue of unilateral versus multilateral liberalization was raised by several delegations.
In this sense,RTAs can serve as a" building block" for multilateral liberalization.
Strengthening multilateral liberalization was considered to be important.
Adequate pacing and sequencing between domestic reform, and regional and multilateral liberalization are also important.
The possibility of a multilateral liberalization of air transport has been studied, but no initiative has been taken to carry it through.
Nevertheless, it saw bilateral and regional arrangements as a complement to multilateral liberalization, not a substitute.
The GATS opens a new area for multilateral liberalization through the future extension of specific commitments.
However, adequate pacing and sequencing between domestic reforms and regional and multilateral liberalization processes were critical.
Future multilateral liberalization efforts should address and remove tariff barriers in sectors of particular export interest to developing countries.
Still, the key to sustained long-term trade growth is multilateral liberalization through negotiations where all countries can participate effectively.
A satisfactory solution that mitigates the likely adverse effects frompreference erosion for affected countries without stopping multilateral liberalization has not yet been found.
It launched a newround of trade negotiations to continue the process of multilateral liberalization but with particular attention to placing the needs and interests of developing countries at the heart of the negotiations.
The global economic downturn, particularly the decoupling of Asian and United States growth,provided opportunities for re-engaging the interest of exporters and countries in deepening multilateral liberalization.
While preferences are diminishing through regional and multilateral liberalization, they continue to represent a critical competitive edge for them in major developed country markets.
The continuing analysis and growing understanding of trade in services in the developing countries arefacilitating identification of anticompetitive practices affecting the multilateral liberalization process and the interests of developing countries in particular.
Regional liberalization is often sequenced as a transition to multilateral liberalization as it can help strengthen indigenous supply capacities and regulatory effectiveness before they face competition at the global level.
Thus, we suggest that NEPAD make a strong case for aid flows, both compensatory and short-term adjustment-oriented, to African countries which are seriouslyaffected by the reduced value of their traditional preferences as multilateral liberalization proceeds.
It was suggested by some participants that further negotiations on multilateral liberalization and the extension of the scope of the multilateral trading system would substantially alleviate remaining concerns relating to regionalism.
While there is no easy answer to this issue, possible approaches include widening and deepening existing preferential schemes and enhancing utilization, adopting simple, flexible and realistic rules of origin adapted to the industrial profiles of beneficiary countries,while ensuring progress in multilateral liberalization.
More specifically, in the financial services sector, multilateral liberalization may, on the part of developing countries, call for a careful analysis of the pace and sequencing of reductions of access barriers to their domestic markets in line with individual development needs.
The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation(APEC) process started in 1989 and has made considerable progress towards its objective of voluntarily removing barriers to trade in goods and services and investment among economies of the Pacific basin,which also contributes to strengthening multilateral liberalization.
A view was expressed that thereis a dynamic interaction between regional liberalization and multilateral liberalization, ultimately increasing the degree of liberalization in trade and investment in the world economy, and that this dynamism should be utilized for further progress.
Multilateral liberalization of temporary movement through commercially meaningful GATS commitments could be one of the best ways to attenuate permanent or illegal migration and maximize gains for sending and receiving countries.
In the longer term, by the time of the achievement of APEC objectives envisaged between 2010 and2020, multilateral liberalization of trade and investment will have made major progress, as will have the production and trade structures of APEC developing member States.
For some, multilateral liberalization was most effective in liberalizing world trade, while for others, services RTAs were more dynamic and could be a stepping stone for multilateral liberalization-- for example, countries with RTAs had advantages in multilateral negotiations, as they could more easily identify their measures for liberalization.
Throughout the past two decades, developing countries have pursued trade liberalization, both as part of multilateral liberalization under the WTO Agreements and unilaterally, including under structural adjustment programmes and North-South regional trade agreements.
Other adjustments include the need to replace tariff revenues as protection is reduced; the likely losses of preferences in overseasmarkets as MFN rates are lowered under multilateral liberalization; and intra- and inter-sectoral reallocation of resources in response to changes in the levels of protection.
In the APEC context,open regionalism implies that member countries support the acceleration of multilateral liberalization of trade and investment, while simultaneously progressing with regional trade and investment and promoting the free flow of goods, services and capital through non preferential methods.
Economic integration arrangements and the multilateral trading system can co-exist;the conclusion of the Uruguay Round Agreements demonstrates that the multilateral liberalization of trade in goods and services and the creation of new multilateral rules and disciplines can be achieved with the active participation of economic integration groupings and their member States.