Examples of using Optional protocol should in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
A possible optional protocol should.
Belarus, Croatia, Ethiopia, Peru and Spain noted that the optional protocol should be comprehensive in scope.
A possible optional protocol should consider the question of reservations.
The representative of Germany said that under the Convention against Torture,States could already seek a dialogue on the prevention of torture and that the draft optional protocol should establish an additional preventive mechanism that would go beyond that provision.
A possible optional protocol should consider.
The optional protocol should be consistent with, and complementary to, similar existing mechanisms, and these should be drawn upon in its elaboration.
More specifically, the AAJ maintained that the draft optional protocol should include the following offences, which should be classified as international crimes.
India stated that the optional protocol should be based on a common understanding of criteria against which States ' obligations of" progressive realization" would be assessed.
The observer for Portugal said that the provisions to be incorporated in the optional protocol should strengthen or complement the provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Spain considered that an optional protocol should contain both procedures since they were complementary. The inquiry procedure was particularly important in dealing with serious and systematic violations of the rights of women.
Consistent with the campaign for their universal ratification, the optional protocol should apply to the rights protected under the Convention and the two optional protocols thereto.
Norway stated that an optional protocol should accord States a wide margin of discretion for decisions relating to resource allocation.
The point was also raised that the optional protocol should focus on the trafficking of children, especially transborder trafficking.
It was also felt that the optional protocol should apply to all situations, not only those of armed conflict.
Italy stressed that the optional protocol should recognize the progressive realization of economic, social and cultural rights.
Egypt and India said that an optional protocol should define clear parameters to be applied by the Committee when examining communications.
Italy stressed that the optional protocol should take into account the specific nature of certain economic, social and cultural rights.
However, all delegations were of the view that the optional protocol should complement and strengthen the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Greece, Poland and Turkey stated that the optional protocol should remain silent on the issue and leave it to be determined by the principles of international law.
Many delegations expressed the view that the optional protocol should also cover the promotion of international cooperation of an administrative and judicial nature.
Australia, Japan and India mentioned that the optional protocol should establish clear criteria for assessing violations of economic, social and cultural rights.
Moreover, ICRC believed that the draft optional protocol should forbid all forms of direct or indirect participation of children in conflicts.
In particular, the ICRC believes that the draft optional protocol should prohibit all forms of participation, whether direct or indirect, by children in armed conflicts.
The NGO Coalition stated that an optional protocol should include provisions for an inquiry procedure, interim measures and a prohibition of reservations.
Some delegations stated that the optional protocol should refer to the relevant national legislation for identifying the persons and entities entitled to represent a child.
The representative of Canada stressed that the draft optional protocol should set out principles, but not procedures, which would have to be arranged by the sub-committee itself.
One delegation indicated that the optional protocol should require the Committee to encourage friendly settlements and asked until what stage of the proceedings friendly settlements could be reached.
These points were: firstly,that new provisions to be incorporated in the optional protocol should strengthen and complement the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and not reaffirm existing standards or undermine them.
Experts, including Committee members, indicated that the optional protocol should uphold the legal personality of children and not reproduce hurdles of legal representation contained in domestic systems.
One delegation held the view that the optional protocol should allow for exceptions to the rule that the Committee should examine communications in closed meetings, when they were in the best interests of the child.