Examples of using Polytechna in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Polytechna ' s claim for contract losses 33.
The amount stated is well below the amount claimed by Polytechna.
Polytechna ' s claim for financial losses 34.
Initially, as soon as approval was obtained, the Al Rafidain Bank transferred payment to Polytechna.
Polytechna ' s claim for financial losses.
On 26 May 1992, the author filed a civil claim fordamages in the Prague District Court(Obvodny sud) against Polytechna.
Table 11. Polytechna ' s claim for contract losses.
First, it considered that only Czech courts were competent to receive the author 's claim, because the Polytechna was based in Prague.
Polytechna continued to seek payment for outstanding amounts up to August 1990.
The State Organisation considered itsobligations fulfilled upon issuing payment orders, and Polytechna had to secure the transfer of outstanding sums with the Al Rafidain Bank.
Polytechna Co. Limited(" Polytechna") is a corporation organised according to the laws of the Czech Republic.
Most of the debt owing by the State Organisation was incurred well before Iraq 's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, and Polytechna may have experienced financial difficulties regardless of the events of August 1990.
Given that Polytechna received compensation for its alleged financial losses, the Panel finds that Polytechna failed to demonstrate that it has suffered a financial loss.
An excerpt from the Commercial Registry inPrague which was submitted with the claim indicates that Polytechna provides consultancy services and expertise in relation to geological research, engineering, mining and other fields.
Polytechna also provided a letter of confirmation dated 11 December 1992 from its bank, Société Générale Komercni Banka, which states the debit interest owing by Polytechna.
In order to obtain an exit-visa and be permitted to take up his United Nations employment,the author allegedly had to sign a secret" pre-contract" with Polytechna on 30 April 1985; he was forbidden from disclosing its contents to third parties, least of all to his United Nations employers.
Moreover, the Panel finds that Polytechna failed to explain how non-payment of outstanding invoices by the State Organisation was directly related to Polytechna ' s financial difficulties.
Finally, by ruling that the obligatory deductions from the author 's United Nations salary were" voluntary" contributions in exchange for Polytechna ' s assistance in securing the author ' s United Nations contract, the District Court is said to have violated the principle of impartiality.
In particular, Polytechna did not demonstrate that it had no other option but to draw credits and to incur late charges on debts to local clients because of the debt accumulated by the State Organisation.
As a result of political changes in Czechoslovakia since November 1989,in a letter addressed to the author on 2 January 1990, Polytechna allegedly admitted its wrongdoing and offered to negotiate amicable settlements with all former United Nations personnel affected.
Polytechna was also unable to prepare its audit statements for 1990, which were, according to Polytechna, required under Iraqi law as a condition of further operation of its office in Baghdad and of transfer of all outstanding amounts to Prague.
He argues that the State party has factually misrepresented his case: there was nothing" voluntary" about his payments to Polytechna or his obligation not to disclose the secret contract; after all, Polytechna itself had admitted in 1990 that its actions, which were improper and unlawful, were based on directives of the former regime.
With regard to his claim against the Slovak Republic, since the laws governing the separation of Czechoslovakia required that cases against former federal Czech or Slovak Federal Republic(CSFR) institutions be examined by the courts in the district in which they were based,he pursued his case against the former federal institution Polytechna in the Czech Republic.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that Polytechna failed to provide sufficient evidence that the alleged expenses were incurred as a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
It notes that the author argued that the Czech Republic had breached article 2(3)(a) of the Covenant by denying him judicial protection against a violation of his rights under the United Nations Convention and article 2(3)(b) by not informing him about the existence of the Constitutional Court; however, the domestic proceedings concerned analleged breach of the United Nations Convention by his Polytechna contract.
The national courts ruled that his Polytechna contract had been" voluntary" only because they allegedly did not understand the provisions of the United Nations Convention.
In support of its claim for contract losses, Polytechna provided extensive evidence, including copies of the five contracts, as well as all of the outstanding invoices rendered pursuant to those contracts.
With the collapse of the former regime in 1989, he requested Polytechna to reimburse him for those deductions, as they allegedly contravened the United Nations Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations.
It concluded that the author ' s payments to Polytechna were" voluntary contributions" for its mediation services in recruiting him to the United Nations, although the author had received a direct job offer from the United Nations.
In support of its claim for the late charges, Polytechna submitted a self-generated four-page document listing the names of local clients in respect of whom Polytechna incurred late charges on debts in the amount of USD 16,444.