Examples of using Specific proof in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
In other words, any specific proof that the customers want to buy it.
Those agreements have allowed us to become thefirst country to issue“sale of oxygen” certificates as specific proof of the quantity of captured emissions.
In the absence of specific proof to the contrary, the claim is not compensable.
Applying the principles outlined by the" E2A" Panel to the claim under review,the Panel finds that the claimant has not provided the specific proof required and, therefore, no compensation is recommended.
Provide specific proof that the failure to perform was the direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Part or all of claimed loss is unsubstantiated; No specific proof that shipment did not violate trade embargo.
The" E2A" Panel has found in previous reports that due to the breakdown of civil order and the widespread destruction of property at Kuwaiti airports and seaports,claimants faced practical difficulties in obtaining specific proof of the circumstances in which goods were lost.
The Panel requires such claimants to provide specific proof that they have been authorized, or are otherwise entitled, to bring the claims.
Due to the breakdown of civil order and the widespread destruction of property at Kuwaiti airports and seaports,claimants faced practical difficulties in obtaining specific proof of the circumstances in which the goods were lost.
A fourth claimant has provided specific proof that Iraq ' s invasion and occupation directly caused the debtor ' s failure to perform.
In these situations, the Panel finds that the language of paragraph 10 of decision 9 requires that, unlike the situation of contracts with Iraq,claimants provide specific proof that the failure to perform was the direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel has held that claimants must provide specific proof that the failure of a debtor to pay was the direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Where performance of a contract with a non-Iraqi party did not occur within the compensable area, a claim based upon the contract 's interruption is compensable only if the claimant has provided specific proof that the interruption was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The claimant was requested by the Panel to provide specific proof that it had been authorized, or was is otherwise entitled, to bring the claim on behalf of its customer.
Dealing with similar claims, the" E2A" Panel has found that the breakdown of civil order and the military operations that took place in Kuwait had a particular impact upon the sea and air ports of Kuwait,and further noted the difficulty faced by claimants in providing specific proof of the circumstances in which goods were lost.
The Panel has found that a claimant must provide specific proof that the failure of a non-Iraqi debtor to pay was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
In its previous reports, the Panel has found that, in the case of contracts to which Iraq was not a party,claimants must provide specific proof that the failure of a debtor to pay was the direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
This Panel has found that a claimant must provide specific proof that the failure of a non-Iraqi debtor to pay was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
With respect to the application of the directness requirement to claims involving non-payment for goods delivered or services provided to Kuwaiti parties,a claimant must provide specific proof of the direct link between Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait and the Kuwaiti buyer ' s non-payment for the goods delivered or the services provided.
This Panel has found that a claimant must provide specific proof that the failure of a non-Iraqi debtor to pay was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Unlike the situation of contracts with Iraq,decision 9 requires claimants to provide specific proof that the other party's failure to perform was the direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel has found that a claimant must provide specific proof that the failure of a non-Iraqi debtor to pay was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
For contracts that were not with Iraq,the Panel has found that a claimant must provide specific proof that the failure of a non-Iraqi debtor to pay was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
This Panel has found that a claimant must provide specific proof that the failure of a non-Iraqi debtor to pay was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel refers to its conclusion in its second report that, unlike the situation of contracts with Iraq,such losses are compensable only if the claimant has provided specific proof that the other party's failure to perform was the direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait and not its independent decision. E2(2) report, para 89; E2(1) report, para.
The Panel has held that a claimant must provide specific proof of the direct link between Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait and the Kuwaiti buyer ' s non-payment for goods delivered or services provided./.
In accordance with the rule stated at paragraph above, specific proof is required that the loss was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the claimant has not provided specific proof that the non-payment was the direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait and recommends no compensation for the losses claimed.
However, the consignment by air would likely have arrived before 17 July 1990,and as the claimant provided no specific proof that the loss was a direct result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait, the Panel finds that the claim based on the consignment by air is not compensable.