Examples of using Territorial changes in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Representatives at the Congress agreed to numerous other territorial changes.
Note: Territorial changes in East-Belgium occurred in 1925, 1940 and 1944.
The contours of these obligations may vary according to the types of territorial changes.
The loss of the nationality of thepredecessor State is an obvious consequence of territorial changes resulting in the disappearance of the international legal personality of the predecessor State.
In India, the war against Mysore and its allies concluded in 1784 without any territorial changes.
The second principleenunciated the principle of self-determination as a commitment" to see no territorial changes that do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned".
Article 15," Succession in respect of part of territory", of the 1978 Vienna Convention concerns casesinvolving the cession of territory or other territorial changes.
State practice hasfocused on the obligation of the new States born from the territorial changes to protect the basic rights of all inhabitants of their territory without distinction.
The Working Group had been right to stress, at the start of its deliberations, the duty of the Statesconcerned to consult among themselves to solve the problems stemming from territorial changes.
The Bosnian Presidency negotiated on them, sought territorial changes in the third plan, obtained additional territory in the fourth plan and has indicated its agreement with all but one aspect: it would still like additional territory".
The International Law Commissionshould scrutinize the effect of different types of territorial changes on nationality.
The Treaty was rather favorable to the Commonwealth, but the Ottoman Emperor also gained what he wanted.There were no territorial changes; the Commonwealth-Ottoman border was confirmed to be the Dniester river, and the Commonwealth recognized Ottoman control over Moldavia. In the Commonwealth, and among the Ukrainian Cossacks, stopping of the huge Ottoman army was seen as a great victory.
One of those obligations is to condemn the illegal use of force andto deny recognition of territorial changes arising from the illegal use of force.
The loss of Finnish citizenship by the population concerned was at the time regulated by the internal law of that State, i.e., the Act on the Acquisition and Loss of Finnish Citizenship of 9 May 1941,which did not contain specific provisions regarding territorial changes.
One of those obligations was to condemn the illegal use of force andto deny recognition of the territorial changes arising from the illegal use of force.
The territorial changes of Poland immediately after World War II were very extensive, the Oder- Neisse line[1] became Poland's western border and the Curzon Line[2] its eastern border. In 1945, after the defeat of Nazi Germany, Poland's borders were redrawn in accordance with the decisions made first by the Allies at the Tehran Conference of 1943 where the Soviet Union demanded the recognition of the line proposed by British Foreign Secretary Lord Curzon in 1920.[3].
Initial discussions between Ali Pasha(Ottoman side) and Mirza Muhammed(Persian side)in Iran about the territorial changes presented no big problem.
Cretan War Greece and the Aegean c. 201 BC Date 205 BC- 200 BC Location Crete, Rhodes, Greece, Asia Minor,and Aegean Sea Result Rhodian victory Territorial changes Eastern Crete to Rhodes Belligerents Macedonia, Hierapytna, Olous, Aetolia, Spartan pirates, Acarnania Rhodes, Pergamum, Byzantium, Cyzicus, Athens, Knossos Commanders and leaders Philip V, Dicaearchus, Nicanor the Elephant Attalus I, Theophiliscus † Cleonaeus.
From July 2013, however the situation became a stalemate, with fighting continuing on all fronts between variousfactions with numerous casualties, but without major territorial changes.
There are no, because there cannot be any, rational arguments that are the slightest bit acceptable to justify pursuing the conflict, especially if we bear in mind who are the major beneficiaries in Bosnia andHerzegovina of the territorial changes,“ethnic cleansing” of entire regions, and murdering of the very idea of tolerance, mutual respect and coexistence between peoples of different origins or faiths.
The Gaue were formed in 1926 as Nazi Partyregional districts in Weimar Germany based on the territorial changes after the First World War.[1] The Gau system was established in 1934 as part of the Gleichschaltung process, replacing the de jure system of Länder(states) and Prussian provinces, which held no administrative purpose since the Enabling Act of 1933 and were reduced to rudimentary bodies. Each Gau was headed by an administrative leader, the Gauleiter, a high-ranking Nazi Party official with near-autocratic powers.
In terms of the general human rights situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the SpecialRapporteur notes that the military activities in recent months and the accompanying territorial changes have yielded new evidence of human rights violations, both past and present.
Mr. SMEJKAL(Czech Republic) said that the topic of State succession and its impact on the nationality of natural and legal persons was a complex problem theanalysis of which must take into account a situation in which territorial changes were affecting the nationality of millions of persons.
This homogeneity is a result of post World War II deportations ordered by the Soviet authorities, who wished to remove the sizeable Polish minorities from Lithuania,Belarus and Ukraine and repatriation of Ukrainians from Poland to the Soviet Union(see territorial changes of Poland and historical demography of Poland for details).
The problems of nationality arising in the context of different types of territorial change should be addressed on a case-by-case basis in relation to the characteristics of the various types of succession.
The classification of cases of State succession proposed by the Working Group was considered to be a practical analytical tool for consideration of the rights and obligations of predecessor and successor States with respect topersons whose nationality would be affected by the territorial change.
Nevertheless, they provide useful guidance to the States concerned by offering solutions which can mutatis mutandis be used by nationallegislators in search of solutions to problems arising from territorial change.
Such person may either have the right to acquire the nationality of the successor State or one of the successor States when there are several successor States, or to maintain the nationality of thepredecessor State if that State continues to exist after the territorial change.
Nevertheless, they provide useful guidance to the States concerned by offering solutions which can mutatis mutandis be used by nationallegislators in search of solutions to problems arising from territorial change.
That provision therefore supported the view that theprotection of the individual against any detrimental effects resulting from a territorial change should always constitute the ultimate goal of the Sixth Committee when it explored existing rules or formulated new rules on nationality.