Examples of using Be declared invalid in English and their translations into Bulgarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
There were two grounds on which it could be declared invalid.
A design right may be declared invalid even after it has lapsed or has been surrendered.
Third parties can request that your design be declared invalid.
A Community design may be declared invalid even after the Community design has lapsed or has been surrendered.
An►M1 EU trade mark◄ as referred to in paragraph 1 may not be declared invalid.
The registration of a design may be declared invalid even after it has lapsed or has been surrendered.
A Community trade mark as referred to in paragraph 1 may not be declared invalid.
What you and the employer signed the document may be declared invalid if it is not one of the mandatory items.
If this is not the case or the vaccination date is not specified,the passport can be declared invalid.
Your insurance may be declared invalid in such cases, and financial losses and claims are paid by the offending driver.
If the contract is signed under criminal circumstances,then this contract should be declared invalid," Buric stressed.
However, as Article 44a of Regulation No 1290/2005 has to be declared invalid for the reasons indicated above, Article 42(8b) of that regulation must be declared invalid in like manner.
A confession, withdrawal or agreement on which the decision was based is invalid or may be declared invalid;
A trade mark may not be declared invalid on the ground that there is an earlier conflicting trade mark if the latter does not fulfil the requirements of use set out in Article 10(1) and(2), or in Article 10(3).
If the previous question is answered in the negative,must Article 16 of Regulation No 659/1999/EC of 22 March 1999 be declared invalid on the basis that it is in breach of Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union(formerly Article 88(2) EC)?
A Community trade mark may not be declared invalid where the proprietor of a right referred to in paragraphs 1 or 2 consents expressly to the registration of the Community trade mark before submission of the application for a declaration of invalidity or the counterclaim.
An EU act that does not comply with EU fundamental rights and cannot be interpreted in conformity with them is invalid and can be annulled through an annulment action before the Court of Justice orthe General Court, or be declared invalid by a preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice(see section 4).
That decision must therefore be declared invalid since, owing to the breaches of fundamental rights described above, the safe harbour scheme which it establishes cannot be regarded as ensuring an adequate level of protection of the personal data transferred from the European Union to the United States under that scheme.
However, under Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009, where an EU trade mark has been registered in breach of theprovisions of Article 7(1)(b) of that regulation, it may nevertheless not be declared invalid if, in consequence of the use that has been made of it, it has after registration acquired distinctive character in relation to the goods or services for which it is registered.
Having not done so, the AG stated that the Decision should be declared invalid“since, owing to the breaches of fundamental rights described above, the safe harbour scheme which it establishes cannot be regarded as ensuring an adequate level of protection of the personal data transferred from the European Union to the United States under that scheme.”.
Where the►M1 EU trade mark◄ has been registered in breach of theprovisions of Article 7(1)(b),(c) or(d), it may nevertheless not be declared invalid if, in consequence of the use which has been made of it, it has after registration acquired a distinctive character in relation to the goods or services for which it is registered.
The AG believes the Decision must be declared invalid since the existence of a derogation which allows in such general and imprecise terms the principles of the Safe Harbour scheme to be disregarded prevents in itself that scheme to be considered as ensuring an adequate level of protection of the personal data transferred to the US from the EU.
I am therefore of the view that Decision 2000/520 must be declared invalid since the existence of a derogation which allows in such general and imprecise terms the principles of the safe harbour scheme to be disregarded prevents in itself that scheme from being considered to ensure an adequate level of protection of the personal data which is transferred to the United States from the European….
However, the results were declared invalid due to low voter turnout.
Three of the ballots were declared invalid.
Seven of the votes were declared invalid by the electoral committee.
Three votes were declared invalid.
Fifteen papers were declared invalid.
The RCD is declared invalid.
In previous elections, ballot papers without the official seal were declared invalid.