Examples of using Reduction target in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The reduction target is inadequate.
What we are doing is saying that the common European reduction target should be 20.
The Commission proposed a reduction target of 135 grams of CO2 per kilometre.
Therefore, let us now present a clear offer of EUR 30 billion for developing countries, andthen the onus will be on the United States to come forward with its own reduction target.
Meeting the 30% reduction target in carbon emissions by 2020 is a priority.
What we in the EU are focusing on- apart from the fact that we must have a reduction target that is ambitious enough- is a financing plan.
The 25% reduction target laid down is open to doubt, however, as it was chosen at random.
We now have a deadline on the introduction of a maritime emissions reduction target and many other small, but positive moves.
The first concerns a reduction target: some fellow members are saying that this is simply not possible.
In this case, the emissions of the baseline year are divided by the number of inhabitants in the same year, and the percentage emission reduction target is calculated on that basis.
We have set a reduction target for aviation of 10% and for shipping of 20% by 2020 compared with 2005 levels.
I particularly wish to say how glad I am that we will be keeping to the 20% emissions reduction target, so that we might say that Parliament and the Council have not watered down anything whatsoever.
In principle, the reduction target should be set as an“absolute” value percentage of quantity of CO2 emissions calculated for the baseline year.
All Covenant signatories commit to submitting their Sustainable Energy Action Plans(SEAPs), within the year following their adhesion, andtherefore showing how to reach their CO2 reduction target by 2020.
I believe that we need to increase our reduction target from 20% to 30% and we need mandatory targets for energy efficiency.
I say we have stepped up our efforts because, as you know, the priority proposed by Parliament has been agreed;that is to say, a long-term reduction target has been included, of 95 grams of CO2 per kilometre by 2020.
In the light of the information we have now,a 30% reduction target will cost less than what was estimated to be the cost of cutting emissions by 20% two years ago.
In my view, the emissions trading scheme is the most cost-efficient, demand-sensitive andobjective market-based instrument available for reaching Europe's greenhouse gas emissions reduction target of at least 20% by 2020.
Europe can resume its leadership by immediately increasing its reduction target to 30% and by granting at least EUR 30 billion in aid to the countries of the South.
CO2- or CO2 equivalent reduction target per sector Please specify the CO2- or CO2 equivalent reduction target per sector as for the energy savings.
In this report we therefore call for auctioning of emission permits,we demand an emissions cap which is consistent with the reduction target of 30%, and restrictions and tough requirements for the use of flexible mechanisms.
As you know, we have set a 30% reduction target, provided that other developed countries follow, or a 20% target if they do not sign up to an international agreement on reducing emissions.
We are going to deliver on our Kyoto Protocol targets, both as the EU-15 and as the EU-27, we are going to achieve the 8% reduction target; indeed, due to the efforts ofthe new Member States, as the EU-27 we are even going to overshoot the 8% reduction target.
It was also agreed at the spring summit that the reduction target would be raised to 30% if other industrialised nations committed themselves to cutting their greenhouse-gas emissions.
Without an international agreement, unilaterally raising the emissions reduction target could threaten the competitiveness of our industry as well as growth and jobs in the European Union.
This approach will make the greenhouse gas emissions reduction target set for a particular country compatible with the holistic, global treatment of each industrial sector, thus preventing carbon leakage.
I believe that it is extremely important for the European Union to make the transition to a reduction target of more than 20% only while retaining certain conditions, without which we consider that the EU's effort would be excessive.
The EU should act unilaterally to raise the emission reduction target for 2020, and to persuade other developed countries to agree an overall emission reduction target of 80% to 95% by 2020.
As far as I am concerned, less CO2 is not tantamount to less economic activity, andso we can focus on a reduction target of more than 20%, as that will present opportunities for more green jobs, for innovation and for sustainable economic growth.
For example, if the calculation of emission reductions includes those achieved by investments in'avoided deforestation'- depending on whether this is calculated in the United States' emission reduction target, or in the financing, or whatever- this is something which must be clarified in order to determine the comparability between the targets of the United States and the European Union and other developed countries.