Examples of using Examining an asylum application in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
To facilitate the determination of the State responsible for examining an asylum application;
In particular, the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application submitted by a person enjoying temporary protection pursuant to this Directive, shall be the Member State which has accepted his transfer onto its territory.
DA I have today in the European Parliament voted in favour of the European Parliament's report on examining an asylum application.
We believe that the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application should not necessarily be the first country entered.
(FR) Mr President, the Dublin system must be used to determine the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application.
The purpose of the Dublin system is to determine the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application made in the territory of one of the EU Member States, Norway or Iceland.
We aim to complete new sets of rules on the reception of asylum seekers, the definition of a refugee andalso the question as to which state is responsible for examining an asylum application.
Establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national.
It will facilitate the application of the Dublin II Regulation, which makes it possible to determine the European Union(EU)country responsible for examining an asylum application.
The Dublin Regulation, that is, the regulation establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application, is intended to prevent abuse of asylum procedures in the form of multiple applications submitted by the same person in several Member States.
These proposals are aimed at extending to Denmark the provisions ofthe Eurodac system and the procedure for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application.
Proposal for a Council regulation establishing the criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national: COM(2001) 447; Bull.
We are today examining a proposal for a Council regulation establishing the criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application.
Although, generally speaking, the aims of the Dublin system, in particular the establishment of a clear andviable mechanism for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application, have largely been achieved, problems remain with the efficiency of the system and its application in practice, as well as with the cost, which has not been evaluated.
Family unity should be preserved in so far as this is compatible with the other objectives pursued by establishing criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application.
In the context of asylum, the adoption of the Dublin II Regulation establishing the criteria andmechanisms for determining Member State responsibility for examining an asylum application, and the directive on minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, were major achievements.
We therefore feel that the Council must introduce a'fair and efficient' asylum procedure and a'clear and workable' method including these new provisions on the criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application.
TAKING INTO ACCOUNT that the Council Regulation(EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national, hereinafter referred to as the"Dublin II Regulation", replaces the"Dublin Convention";
The purpose of the Dublin Convention andEurodac is to allocate to a single Member State responsibility for examining an asylum application, and the justification for the proposed regulation is that there is a need to extend fingerprinting to certain categories of illegal immigrants on the grounds that a substantial number of them will have claimed asylum previously or intend to do so.
It is a specific rule under the Dublin Regulation,which establishes that the Member States have to assess which Member State is responsible for examining an asylum application lodged on their territory.
Since the objective of the proposed measure, namely the establishment of criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and, given the scale and effects, can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
On 29 May, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate with Iceland and Norway an agreement on the criteria andmechanisms for determin ing the State responsible for examining an asylum application made in one of the Member States of the European Union, Iceland or Norway.
And this is how illegal immigration and the organised networks start, with the growth of mafias and crime, involvement in which is inexcusable but which is only possible because States, consisting of well-intentioned individuals,have never agreed on minimum standards for actually making one State responsible for examining an asylum application.
Draft agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark extending to Denmark the provisions of Regulation(EC) No 343/2003 establishing the criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national and Regulation(EC) No 2725/2000 concerning the establishment of‘Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention.
Quite apart from that, though, it is of extreme importance that the other three cornerstones of the common asylum system be added without delay, these being the directive on the recognition of refugee status and on subsidiary forms of protection,the Regulation on the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application and the amended version of the directive on asylum procedures.
Denmark will abstain from entering into international agreements which may affect oralter the scope of the Regulations as annexed to this Agreement concerning the determination of responsibility for examining an asylum application or measures concerning the comparison of fingerprints of third country nationals covered by the Eurodac Regulation unless it is done with the agreement of the Community and satisfactory arrangements have been made with regard to the relationship between this Agreement and the international agreement in question.
The next item is the report(A5-0081/2002) by Luís Marinho, on behalf of the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs, on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing the criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national COM(2001) 447- C5-0403/2001- 2001/0182CNS.
Report(A5-0081/2002) by Mr Marinho, on behalf of the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs, on the p roposal for a Council regulation establishing the criteria andmechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national COM(2001) 447- C5-0403/2001- 2001/0182CNS.
Contrary to the proposals by the Commission and by the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs, Amendments Nos 14, 15 and24 propose that appeals against decisions concerning which country should examine an asylum application should have a suspensive effect on the transfer of refugees from one Member State to another.