Examples of using Trapping methods in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
A person's ethnic origin can never entitle them to use cruel trapping methods.
Over the next year, there are to be talks on humane trapping methods, and humane traps are to be developed.
We therefore have to reject the attempts by the Canadian Government to delay an international agreement on humane trapping methods.
The debate on hunting and humane trapping methods has been both long and heated, within the EU and in the rest of the world.
But this is no reason to stop them selling any more furs at all because of the trapping methods which they use.
The trapping methods used for the species listed in Annex I meet internationally agreed humane trapping standards.
The draft directive implements the international agreement on humane trapping methods, which was concluded in the context of the common trade policy.
The best approach for all the parties concerned is to establish clear rules as soon as possible, so thatany switch to other trapping methods can begin.
To go beyond that could lead to a situation where most trapping methods, including those currently used in the European Union, would not meet the standards.
We very much hope that all the political controversy surrounding this piece of European legislation will finally result in the speedy introduction of safer trapping methods.
There must be more humane trapping methods, but we in the House must not allow ourselves to be blackmailed by postponements and other tactics into delaying the approval of these methods. .
Along with a large majority of the ELDR Group, I think that it is quite deplorable that the Commission should not have kept to its word andis now imposing an optional agreement on trapping methods.
On behalf of the muskrat,we must also find more humane trapping methods that can be used, but until such time as suitable alternatives are found, I think a clear exemption position for the Netherlands or for a situation in which safety is at risk, would be welcomed.
The prohibition is postponed for one year expiring on 31 December 1995 when it is found that sufficient progress has been achieved concerning the elaboration of humane trapping methods on the territory of the countries concerned.
As we all know, certain circumstances under which trapping methods and traps may be necessary, but we stated from the very outset that it was inappropriate to describe the directive as laying down humane trapping standards.
Certain animal species that are protected under the Habitat Directive- I would particularly mention the ban on catching and killing such wild animals as the otter, beaver, wolf andlynx- are also listed in the annex to the proposal on humane trapping methods.
In terms of the psychological andbehavioural development of mammals, the main moral objection to the use of trapping methods as a means of killing is that the period between the animal being trapped and becoming unconscious, or its death struggle time, is too long.
Whereas, therefore, the use of the leghold trap within the Community should be prohibited andmeasures should be taken to enable the importation of furs of certain species to be prohibited when they originate in a country where the leghold trap is still used or where trapping methods do not meet internationally agreed humane trapping standards.
Whereas Regulation(EEC) No 3254/91(3), and in particular the second indent of Article 3(1)thereof, refers to internationally agreed humane trapping standards with which trapping methods used by third countries that have not prohibited leghold traps must conform in order for those countries to be able to export pelts and products manufactured from certain species to the Community;
Those countries would never have taken part in negotiations on any other basis, as they made clear from toe very first, because despite our efforts to persuade them to the contrary,they never shared toe view that all types of leghold traps are entirely cruel or more cruel than other trapping methods that are widely used, in the European Union among other places.
In the past, I believe, there were two ways by which this objective might be achieved.One was the conclusion of an agreement on humane trapping methods worthy of their name- which the present version certainly is not; an agreement which lays down high animal welfare standards and at the same time takes due account of the justified concerns of indigenous peoples.
In the first place we need to remember that this trapping method concerns only 10% of the animals whose fur is destined for the clothing and related industries.