Examples of using Contested act in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The contested act.
Directive 2017/853 is the contested act.
That contested act was made known to Athinaïki Techniki by the letter in dispute.
But EU Court can decide to suspend the contested act.
On 28 December 1998, the contested act was notified to DSTV.
The appeal mentioned above is suspensive from the effect of the contested act.
In the present case, however, the contested act is distinct from Decision 93/82.
Plaintiffs have to demonstrate an interest in the annulment of the contested act.
Annul the contested act and, consequently, all implementing acts. .
Courts can adjudicate on complete or partial annulment of the contested act.
First plea: non-existence of the contested act in Cases T-327/99 and T-329/99.
Burden of execution is imposed on the administrative body, which enacted the contested act.
The contested Act does not mention the possibility of inheritance between registered partners.
Therefore the conditions laid down for recovery by offsetting were fulfilled at the time of the contested act.
The contested act does, therefore, constitute an act open to challenge for the purposes of Article 230 EC.
The Court may, however, if it considers that circumstances so require,order that application of the contested act be suspended.
The contested act was not intended to produce legal effects of its own, distinct from those of that decree.
X-Stop, if not answered, the execution of the contested act, communicate the decision to the House of representatives and the Senate;
CAP, where action is proposed for annulment, the application must be notified, under pain of forfeiture,to the public administration that issued the contested act.
According to the Advocate General, the formal andprocedural aspects of the contested act should be subject to review of external lawfulness.
Before raising the allegation of forgery, the party must notify a notice to the other parties, asking them to declare whether ornot they intend to use the contested act.
Subject: Such as in the Modjahedines case,the Court maintained that the contested act had been adopted via a legislative procedure that had not respected the claimant's defence rights.
The Union must be bound by the rule relied on, its content must be unconditional and sufficiently precise and, last, its nature andits broad logic must not preclude judicial review of the contested act.
Actions before the Supreme Court do not have suspensory effect, butmay be accompanied by a request to defer implementation of the contested act, with that request being subject to the same conditions, particular as regards the time-limit.
Appeal may be made only against the final decision, a decision declaring the proceedings inadmissible and decisions that provide for measures involving no new action orsuspending the effects of the contested act.
Lastly, when the contested act is a positive one, the purpose of the decision granting amparo, which must be handed down within 45 days of receipt of the official documents, is to restore to the injured party full exercise of his violated rights and to restore the status quo ante.
The only decisions which may be appealed against, are the final decision, the decision by which the proceedings are declared inadmissible and decisions that provide for measures involving no new action orsuspending the effects of the contested act.
First of all, according to the first of the conditions governing the possibility of relying on the rules of customary international law laid down by the Court where the contested act is an act of purely internal unilateral secondary law, the rules relied on must be capable of calling in question the competence of the Union to adopt that act. .
Under article 239(3) of the same Code, a complaint to a court should be submitted within one month from the date of the notification of the prior complaint to the competent administrative authority, orwithin one month starting from the date of the contested act.
The Government believes that the contested Act does not provide added value to the agreements currently in force regulating international legal aid in criminal matters between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Serbia, while the existent legal framework makes the application of the provisions of the contested Act redundant.