Examples of using Contested act in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
An action brought before the General Court does not suspend the operation of the contested act.
The legal context in which the contested act was adopted is that of Directive 2002/21.
The contested act in this case is a Commission's letter of comments on the basis of Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21.
Consequently, the Council has, in this case, stated reasons for the contested acts that are sufficient.
It must therefore be held that the contested act is not of direct concern to Vodafone for the purposes of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC.
order that application of the contested act be suspended.
The Commission and the Kingdom of Spain submit that the contested act is not one which is amenable to review under Article 230 EC.
The contested acts accordingly describe the overall situation that led to their adoption
In the event that the Court finds that the contested acts are valid,
The contested act does not therefore produce binding legal effects
The Commission and the Kingdom of Spain submit that the contested act is not of direct concern to Vodafone within the meaning of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC.
In the light of the foregoing, an examination of the question of an alleged misuse of powers by the Council has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of the contested acts.
Vodafone submits that the contested act produces legal effects that are binding on it and capable of affecting its interests within the meaning of the caselaw cited at paragraph 69 above.
By letter of 30 January 2006 the Commission sent the CMT, pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21, a letter of comments on draft measure ES/2005/0330‘the letter of 30 January 2006' or‘the contested act.
It follows that neither the content of the contested act nor the legal context in which it was adopted show that it constitutes an act producing binding legal effects.
requires that no contested act of an institution, a body
Lastly, Vodafone submits that the contested act is of individual concern to it within the meaning of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC, and moreover this does not appear to be contested by the Commission.
Rosneft does not, however, explain, in any way, how that error is such as to affect the validity of the provisions of the contested acts.
On the contrary, the press release of 31 January 2006 relating to the contested act confirms that the Commission's comments under Article 7(3)
The contested act which gave rise to the judgment in Infront WM v Commission, cited in paragraph 53 above,
The omission to which Vodafone refers can be explained by the fact that the contested act falls entirely within the scope of the procedure of Article 7(3),
provided that such appeal is accompanied by an application either for a stay of execution of the contested act or for the adoption of interim measures.
In the light of the above, an examination of the contested acts in the light of the principle of equal treatment has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of those acts. .
Rosneft had already brought an action before the General Court for the annulment of the contested acts.
the Court considers that even if the contested act did constitute an act open to challenge,
and if examination of information at disposal of the court reveals that the contested act is prima facie illegal,
The parties disagree, first, on the question whether the contested act constitutes in part a rejection of the applicant's complaint as regards an independent infringement of Article 82 EC by Ancona Merci.
The comments made by the Commission in a letter under Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21, such as the contested act in this case, do not produce any binding legal effect either vis-à-vis the notifying NRA
In any event, Vodafone submits that the part of the contested act in which the Commission reproduces the wording of Article 7(5) of Directive 2002/21
In a second comment, which concerns the focal point, the Commission noted in the contested act that the CMT had found the existence of such a point,