Examples of using Contested aid in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
The contested aid was abolished by the French authorities in 2002.
it is common ground that the contested aid was not notified in 1988 or in the following years.
it established the relevance of small orders as a criterion for justifying the granting of the contested aid recitals 187 to 197.
The applicant thereby concludes that the contested aid was in actual fact used to finance CELF'S overall activities.
In the present case, the relevant point of reference is when the decision on the compatibility of the contested aid was adopted.
As a consequence, the Commission simply checked the compatibility of the contested aid on the export agency market under Article 87(3)(d) EC recital 186.
It is in the light of those principles that it is necessary to consider whether the applicant has succeeded in demonstrating that the contested decision is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment as regards the examination of whether the contested aid is compatible with the common market.
The first part of the third plea alleges that the contested aid is discriminatory,
including the contested aid, had not been notified.
It is therefore necessary only to examine whether the contested aid had become definitively compatible or incompatible at the time when the contested decision was adopted.
First, it considers that the Commission committed an error by calculating the costs directly associated with small orders during the whole period in which the contested aid was paid on the basis of an extrapolation of the data for 1994 alone.
The Commission therefore declared the contested aid compatible with the common market after weighing the objectives of promoting French culture against those of safeguarding free competition.
It is apparent from the last sentence of Article 1 of the contested decision that the contested aid was declared compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(d) EC.
untilafter the practical application of the contested aid scheme.
The first plea alleges that there is no legal basis for declaring the contested aid compatible with the common market prior to 1 November 1993.
That is particularly so in the present case, since the contested aid was awarded
The applicant is of the view that, since that provision was introduced by the EU Treaty, which entered into force on 1 November 1993, the contested aid could have been declared compatible with the common market only with effect from that date.
Secondly, when examining the compatibility of the contested aid with the common market in coal and steel,
the Commission adopted a new decision declaring the contested aid compatible with the common market(Decision 1999/133/EC concerning State aid in favour of CELF)
It follows from the foregoing that the Commission erred in law in considering that the contested aid was compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(d) EC as regards