Examples of using Contested aid in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
The contested aid was abolished by the French authorities in 2002.
In this case, it is common ground that the contested aid was not notified in 1988 or in the following years.
In the present case, the relevant point of reference is when the decision on the compatibility of the contested aid was adopted.
Finally, the Commission established that the contested aid did not overcompensate the costs of processing of small orders.
First of all, it established the relevance of small orders as a criterion for justifying the granting of the contested aid recitals 187 to 197.
In the contested decision, the Commission concluded that the contested aid was State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC recital 127.
alleging a manifest error of assessment in the examination of the compatibility of the contested aid, must be upheld.
The only subsidy which is the subject of the present case(‘the contested aid') was granted on an annual basis from 1980.
It must be pointed out that the Commission calculated the costs directly associated with processing small orders on the basis of explanations provided to it by the French Republic in the procedure in which the contested aid was examined.
As a consequence, the Commission simply checked the compatibility of the contested aid on the export agency market under Article 87(3)(d)
It is in the light of those principles that it is necessary to consider whether the applicant has succeeded in demonstrating that the contested decision is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment as regards the examination of whether the contested aid is compatible with the common market.
It is apparent from the last sentence of Article 1 of the contested decision that the contested aid was declared compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(d) EC.
The applicant submits that, by declaring the contested aid compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(d) EC in the last sentence of Article 1 of the contested decision,
Annul the last sentence of Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as the Commission declared the contested aid compatible before 1999
Secondly, it verified that the justification for the contested aid was genuine,
First, it considers that the Commission committed an error by calculating the costs directly associated with small orders during the whole period in which the contested aid was paid on the basis of an extrapolation of the data for 1994 alone.
Since no consistent method of calculation was used, the contested aid should be regarded as an operating subsidy, granted irrespective of the extra costs
which entered into force on 1 November 1993, the contested aid could have been declared compatible with the common market only with effect from that date.
That is particularly so in the present case, since the contested aid was awarded
The contested aid consisted of a package of annual subsidies,
It follows from the foregoing that the Commission erred in law in considering that the contested aid was compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(d) EC as regards that part of the aid paid
Finally, it took the view that the contested aid had a cultural objective for the purpose of Article 87(3)(d) EC,
Secondly, when examining the compatibility of the contested aid with the common market in coal